[email protected]

科学发展研究

Scientific Development Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Scientific Development Research . 2022; 2: (2) ; 10.12208/j.sdr.20220035 .

The Connection between Environmental Damage Compensation System and Environmental Public Interest Litigation
生态环境损害赔偿制度与环境公益诉讼的衔接

作者: 梅银洪 *

浙江工商大学法学院 浙江杭州

*通讯作者: 梅银洪,单位:浙江工商大学法学院 浙江杭州;

引用本文: 梅银洪 生态环境损害赔偿制度与环境公益诉讼的衔接[J]. 科学发展研究, 2022; 2: (2) : 42-46.
Published: 2022/7/29 15:22:51

摘要

生态环境损害赔偿制度是在传统的环境公益诉讼基础上,侧重体现和反映国家承担的环境监管和保护职责,对生态环境损害进行救济的专门的制度建设。两种制度现有法理的争议、立法以及执法中的冲突和矛盾还亟待解决和厘清,因此其衔接具有必要性与紧迫性。建构以行政机关优先,环保组织为补充的诉讼主体机制,完善磋商机制,是实现两种制度衔接的可行途径。

关键词: 生态环境损害赔偿;环境公益诉讼;制度衔接

Abstract

The ecological environment damage compensation system is based on the traditional environmental public interest litigation, focusing on reflecting the environmental supervision and protection res- ponsibilities undertaken by the state, and the construction of a special system for relieving ecological environment damage. The existing legal disputes, legislation, and law enforcement conflicts and contradictions between the two systems still need to be resolved and clarified. Therefore, its convergence is necessary and urgent. Constructing a main body of litigation mechanism with administrative organs as the priority and supplemented by environmental protection organizations, perfecting the consultation mechanism is a feasible way to achieve the convergence of the two systems.

Key words: Environmental damage compensation; Environmental public interest litigation; Institutional convergence

参考文献 References

[1]王旭光.论生态环境损害赔偿诉讼的若干基本关系[J].法律适用,2019(21):13.

[2]曾丽渲.论生态环境损害赔偿诉讼与环境民事公益诉讼的整合[D].甘肃:甘肃政法学院,2019.

[3]吕忠梅.环境损害赔偿法的理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2013:12.

[4]汪劲.论生态环境损害赔偿诉讼与关联诉讼衔接规则的建立——以德司达公司案和生态环境损害赔偿相关判例为鉴[J].环境保护,2018(05):38.

[5]竺效.生态损害公益索赔主体机制的构建[J].法学,2016(3):5.

[6]张锋.环境公益诉讼起诉主体的顺位设计刍议[J].法学论坛,2017(2):139

[7]吴应甲.中国环境公益诉讼主体多元化研究[M]. 北京:中国检察出版社,2017:118-146.

[8]施小春.损害赔偿磋商制度研究[D].重庆:西南政法大学,2018