[email protected]

国际护理学研究

International Journal of Nursing Research

您当前位置：首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2022; 4: (2) ; 10.12208/j.ijnr. 20220067 .

Nursing safety study of neurology department in hospitalized patients with cerebral infarction
脑梗死住院患者神经内科护理安全研究

作者： 范蕾红, 刘梦 *

西安医学院第二附属医院 陕西西安

*通讯作者： 刘梦,单位：西安医学院第二附属医院 陕西西安；

引用本文: 范蕾红, 刘梦 脑梗死住院患者神经内科护理安全研究[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2022; 4: (2) : 122-125.
Published: 2022/6/30 16:49:27

摘要

目的 探讨分析脑梗死住院患者神经内科护理安全。方法 选取我科收治的脑梗死患者共100例，患者均为2021.1~2021.12期间收治，分组后分别采取不同护理，给予对照组常规护理，研究组在对照组的基础上实施护理安全管理，观察两组结果。结果 风险事件发生率：研究组为2.00%，对照组为14.00%，前者更低（P＜0.05）；SS-QOL评分：护理前两组无差异（P＞0.05），护理后研究组更高（P＜0.05）；总满意率：研究组为96.00%，对照组为84.00%，前者更高（P＜0.05）。结论 脑梗死住院患者加强护理安全管理具有重要意义，可有效预防风险事件的发生，并可改善患者生存质量，提高护理满意度。

关键词： 脑梗死；住院患者；神经内科；护理安全；常规护理；风险事件；生存质量；护理满意度

Abstract

Objective To analyze the nursing safety of neurology in hospitalized patients with cerebral infarction.
Methods A total of 100 patients with cerebral infarction admitted to our department were selected. All the patients were admitted from 2021.1 to 2021.12. After grouping, they received different nursing care, and the control group was given routine nursing care. The study group implemented nursing safety management on the basis of the control group. group results.
Results The incidence of risk events: the research group was 2.00%, the control group was 14.00%, the former was lower (P<0.05); SS-QOL score: there was no difference between the two groups before nursing (P>0.05), and the research group was higher after nursing (P < 0.05); the overall satisfaction rate: the research group was 96.00%, the control group was 84.00%, the former was higher (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   It is of great significance to strengthen nursing safety management for inpatients with cerebral infarction, which can effectively prevent the occurrence of risk events, improve the quality of life of patients, and improve nursing satisfaction.

Key words： Cerebral Infarction; Inpatients; Neurology; Nursing Safety; Routine Nursing; Risk Events; Quality of life; Nursing Satisfaction

参考文献 References

[1] 马浩源,杨乔,宋怡瑶,等.血小板糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂替罗非班在急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗中的研究进展[J].卒中与神经疾病,2020,27(01).133~135.

[2] 邝雪梅. 神经内科系统化护理干预对改善脑梗死并抑郁患者生活质量效果的观察研究[J]. 中医临床研究, 2018, 010(015):19-21.

[3] 刘金荣. 脑梗死中医护理干预联合常规神经内科护理临床观察[J]. 饮食保健, 2018, 005(024):18-19.

[4] 赵新佳. 神经内科康复护理对脑梗死患者的效果观察[J]. 糖尿病天地•教育（上旬）, 2019, 016(011):235.

[5] 李亮杰, 刘志飞, 贾啓龙,等. 不同时间窗rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死患者的疗效和预后观察[J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2020, 020(001):75-79.

[6] 吴文娟. 心理护理对神经内科脑梗死后抑郁患者的影响研究[J]. 心理医生, 2018, 024(012):6.

[7] 薛新琴. 脑梗死患者护理中偏瘫肢体康复训练的应用及对生活质量的影响分析 ——评《神经内科临床护理》[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2021, 026(8):1.

[8] 黄燕. 脑梗死中医护理干预联合常规神经内科护理效果观察探讨[J]. 中国保健营养, 2019, 029(010):184.

[9] 张冬梅, 朱敏楠. 对缺血性脑梗死患者进行个体化安全护理的效果探讨[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2019,017(23):2.

[10] 巴明, 吴海英, 尹丽娟. 护理安全管理对神经外科护理风险控制的作用解析[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2018, 003(023):145-145.

[11] 陈裴斐、牟朝晖、李玉玲. 风险护理在神经外科重症手术管理中的应用及对患者并发症的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020,018(11):180-183.

[12] 许美卿, 陈映屏, 许佳娜. 风险管理在神经外科护理管理中的应用价值研究[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志，2020，5（32）：165-166.