Application of risk management in nursing management of respiratory medicine
风险管理在呼吸内科护理管理中的应用

摘要

目的 研究分析风险管理在呼吸内科护理管理中的作用。方法 本次实验跨越2020年1月至2022年2月这一时间段，研究人员对70例呼吸内科患者进行研究。研究人员将本次实验研究对象按照双盲对照原则分组，对照组所选35例患者护理管理中应用传统管理模式，实验组所选35例患者护理管理中应用风险管理模式，记录和比较分析对照组及实验组所选患者护理风险事件出现情况、护理质量评分、干预前后生活质量评分（SF-36），并对相关数据加以分析比较。结果 对照组及实验组所选患者中分别有6人及1人出现护理风险事件，占组内所选患者总人数的比例分别为17.14%及2.86%，比较分析护理风险事件出现概率相关数据，有着较大的差距，（p＜0.05）；对照组及实验组护理质量进行比较分析，两组在护理态度、专科护理、基础护理、病房管理方面的评分均有着较大的差距，（p＜0.05）；干预前，对照组及实验组所选患者生活质量评分之间无突出的差距，分别为（60.2±1.3）分及（60.4±1.2）分，（p＞0.05），在干预后，对照组及实验组所选患者生活质量评分进行比较分析，分别为（80.5±2.3）分及（95.4±3.6）分，组间数据比较分析，差异较大，（p＜0.05）。结论 风险管理模式在呼吸内科护理管理中的应用价值远远高于传统管理模式。

Abstract

Objective: To study and analyze the role of risk management in nursing management of respiratory medicine.
Methods: This experiment spanned the time period from January 2020 to February 2022. The researchers studied 70 patients with respiratory medicine. The researchers divided the subjects of this experiment into groups according to the principle of double-blind control. The traditional management mode was used in the nursing management of 35 patients selected in the control group, and the risk management mode was applied in the nursing management of 35 patients selected in the experimental group. The occurrence of nursing risk events, nursing quality scores, and quality of life scores (SF-36) before and after intervention in selected patients in the group and experimental group were compared, and the related data were analyzed and compared.
Results: Among the selected patients in the control group and the experimental group, 6 and 1 patients had nursing risk events, respectively, accounting for 17.14% and 2.86% of the total number of selected patients in the group, respectively. The data related to the occurrence probability of nursing risk events were compared and analyzed. , there is a large gap (p<0.05); the comparison and analysis of the nursing quality of the control group and the experimental group shows that the scores of the two groups in nursing attitude, specialized nursing, basic nursing, and ward management have a large gap, (p <0.05); before the intervention, there was no significant difference between the quality of life scores of the selected patients in the control group and the experimental group, which were (60.2±1.3) points and (60.4±1.2) points, respectively, (p>0.05), and after the intervention, The quality of life scores of the selected patients in the control group and the experimental group were compared and analyzed, which were (80.5±2.3) points and (95.4±3.6) points, respectively. The data between the groups were compared and analyzed, and the difference was large (p<0.05).
Conclusion  : The application value of the risk management model in the nursing management of respiratory medicine is much higher than that of the traditional management model.