Clinical efficacy and safety of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of acne vulgaris
中西医结合治疗寻常型痤疮的临床疗效及安全性

摘要

目的 寻常型痤疮治疗中采用不同治疗方案，总结与探究中医、西医结合治疗方案实施效果。方法 于2020.1月至2021、1月选择因寻常型痤疮而就诊于我科室的病人进行调研，本次调研共纳入100例病人。依照治疗模式，将病人分别纳入不同小组，每组均纳入50例病人。根据治疗举措，将其命名为调研组、常规组，常规组采用常规治疗，即为西医常规治疗，调研组则采用中西医结合治疗方案。总结与探究2种治疗方案实施效果。结果 （1）常规组治疗有效率为80%与调研组的98%相比明显较低，经对照两组之间有明显差异，（P<0.05）。（22）常规组不良反应发生率为12%与调研组的2%不良反应发生率相比较高，经对照两组之间有明显差异，（P<0.05）。（3）常规组暗红斑评分结果与调研组暗红斑评分结果相比较高，常规组瘢痕评分结果与调研组瘢痕评分结果相比较高，常规组色沉评分结果与调研组色沉评分结果相比较高，经对照两组之间有明显差异，（P<0.05）。结论 寻常型痤疮治疗中，中西医结合治疗方案实施效果优异，此方案值得临床应用与普及。

Abstract

Objective Different treatment plans were used in the treatment of acne vulgaris, and to summarize and explore the effect of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine treatment plans.
Methods From January 2020 to January 2021, patients who visited our department due to acne vulgaris were selected for investigation. A total of 100 patients were included in this investigation. According to the treatment mode, the patients were divided into different groups, and each group included 50 patients. According to the treatment measures, they were named as the investigation group and the routine group. The routine group adopted routine treatment, that is, conventional Western medicine treatment, and the investigation group adopted the integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment plan. Summarize and explore the implementation effect of the two treatment programs.
Results (1) The effective rate of treatment in the routine group was 80%, which was significantly lower than that in the investigation group, which was 98%. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the control group (P<0.05). (2) The incidence of adverse reactions in the routine group was 12% higher than that in the investigation group, which was 2%. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the control group (P<0.05). (3) The dark erythema score of the routine group was higher than the dark erythema score of the investigation group, the scar score of the routine group was higher than the scar score of the investigation group, and the pigmentation score of the routine group was compared with the pigmentation score of the investigation group High, there was a significant difference between the two groups after the control (P<0.05).
Conclusion   In the treatment of acne vulgaris, the integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment program has excellent effect, and this program is worthy of clinical application and popularization.