[email protected]

国际临床研究杂志

International Journal of Clinical Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2022; 6: (2) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20220063 .

Clinical efficacy of non-invasive ventilator therapy for heart failure complicated with respiratory failure in ICU ward
ICU病房心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭采用无创呼吸机治疗的临床疗效

作者: 王振 *

昆明同仁医院 云南昆明

*通讯作者: 王振,单位:昆明同仁医院 云南昆明;

收录截图(CNKI-Scholar)

引用本文: 王振 ICU病房心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭采用无创呼吸机治疗的临床疗效[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2022; 6: (2) : 86-89.
Published: 2022/4/25 18:13:52

摘要

目的 实验将探讨ICU病房心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭采用无创呼吸机治疗的临床疗效。方法 研究筛选出了一共60例心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭患者为对象,都于2020年3月至2021年5月进入本院治疗,以平行对照法为原则分组。对照组患者实行常规药物与低流量持续吸氧治疗方案,观察组患者实行常规药物与无创正压通气治疗方案,对比治疗成果。结果 从治疗后动脉血气结果数据可见,观察组Pa02、PaC02、PH值分别为(8.1±2.5)mmHg、(5.4±0.7)mmHg、(7.5±0.4),对照组分别为(7.8±2.1)mmHg、(5.9±0.8)mmHg、(7.4±0.3),观察组优于对照组,对比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对比两组患者治疗后心率与呼吸频率,观察组心率与呼吸频率分别为(62.1±8.9)次/min、(18.8±1.2)次/min,对照组分别为(78.4±8.7)次/min、(26.3±1.6)次/min,观察组明显低于对照组,对比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与此同时,在治疗有效率的调查上,观察组患者的治疗总有效率为96.6%,明显优于对照组的73.3%,差异具有统计学意义。结论 采用无创呼吸机治疗对于ICU病房心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭患者的治疗效果显著,可提高治疗总有效率,我们应当继续坚持这一策略,在继承借鉴中发展。

关键词: 心力衰竭;呼吸衰竭;ICU病房;无创呼吸机

Abstract

Objective: The experiment will explore the clinical efficacy of non-invasive ventilator in the treatment of heart failure complicated with respiratory failure in ICU ward.
Methods: A total of 60 patients with heart failure combined with respiratory failure were screened out in the study, and they were all admitted to our hospital for treatment from March 2020 to May 2021, and were grouped according to the principle of parallel control. The patients in the control group were treated with conventional drugs and low-flow continuous oxygen inhalation therapy, and the patients in the observation group were treated with conventional drugs and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, and the treatment results were compared.
Results: From the data of arterial blood gas results after treatment, the Pa02, PaC02 and PH values of the observation group were (8.1±2.5) mmHg, (5.4±0.7) mmHg, (7.5±0.4), respectively, and the control group were (7.8±2.1) mmHg, (5.9±0.8) mmHg, (7.4±0.3), the observation group was better than the control group, and the comparison was statistically significant (P<0.05). The heart rate and respiratory rate of the two groups of patients after treatment were compared. The heart rate and respiratory rate of the observation group were (62.1±8.9) times/min, (18.8±1.2) times/min, and the control group were (78.4±8.7) times/min, respectively. (26.3±1.6) times/min, the observation group was significantly lower than the control group, and the comparison was statistically significant (P<0.05). At the same time, in the investigation of the treatment efficacy, the total treatment efficacy rate of the observation group was 96.6%, which was significantly better than that of the control group, which was 73.3%, and the difference was statistically significant.
Conclusion  : The use of non-invasive ventilator therapy for patients with heart failure combined with respiratory failure in ICU ward has a significant therapeutic effect, which can improve the total effective rate of treatment. We should continue to adhere to this strategy and develop through inheritance and reference.

Key words: Heart Failure; Respiratory Failure; ICU ward; non-invasive ventilator

参考文献 References

[1] 于洪涛,王孙睿,曹静等.无创呼吸机用于急诊ICU中急性心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭的疗效〔J〕.实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2019,22(7):61一62.

[2] 许本也,张盼盼等.ICU病房心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭采用无创呼吸机治疗的临床疗效观察(J).医学理论与实践,2020,28(l4:)1885一1886

[3] 李郑芳,杨文文,谢小迪等.机械通气辅助治疗老年急性心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭患者的临床观察(J).实用医学杂志,2020,17(l8:)12645一1265.

[4] 王明硕.分析无创呼吸机治疗ICU病房患者心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭的临床疗效[J].世界最新医学信息文摘:电子版,2019(25):45.

[5] 郭建文,邓小树等.无创呼吸机治疗在急性心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭急诊ICU中的应用效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,17(86):132-135.

[6] 张昕,崔宸斌,薛聪等.无创呼吸机应用于治疗ICU病房重症心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭患者的临床研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2019(24):17-18.

[7] 张惠宁,孙华烨等.ICU病房应用无创呼吸机治疗心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭的效果观察[J].中国医学创新,2019(24):15-16.

[8] 杜锦绣,张依依,钱慧进等.无创呼吸机治疗COPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的护理[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2020(4):409-410.

[9] 吕小青,马春娥等.应用无创呼吸机治疗40例心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭的效果观察(J).黑龙江医药科学,2019,38(2):114一115.

[10] 刘丽丽,曹海,王庆安等.无创呼吸机在急性心力衰竭合并呼吸衰竭ICU救治中的疗效观察(J).吉林医学,2019,32(30):63.