Comparative study on the efficacy of different cardiac rehabilitation procedures for postoperative cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction
不同心脏康复程序用于急性心肌梗死患者术后心脏康复的疗效对比研究

摘要

目的 比较不同心脏康复程序在急性心肌梗死（AMI）患者术后心脏康复的疗效。方法 在此次研究中选取70例研究对象，经过对其诊断后确认符合AMI诊断标准，并接受了PCI术（经皮冠状动脉介入）治疗，符合研究入组标准。为达成研究目的，选取了两种不同心脏康复程序，将患者随机分配为了对照组和观察组，其中对照组应用2周心脏康复程序，观察组则应用路径优化10d心脏康复程序，比较其应用效果。结果 对两组患者的LVEF、心功能分级和生存质量进行了统计分析，结果显示观察组明显更优，（P＜0.05）。结论 经过对急性心肌梗死术后患者实施10d心脏康复程序能够有效改善心功能，提高生存质量。

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of different cardiac rehabilitation procedures in postoperative cardiac rehabilitation of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Methods A total of 70 subjects were selected in this study. After their diagnosis, they were confirmed to meet the diagnostic criteria of AMI, and received PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) treatment, which met the study inclusion criteria. In order to achieve the research purpose, two different cardiac rehabilitation programs were selected, and the patients were randomly assigned to the control group and the observation group.
Results The LVEF, cardiac function classification and quality of life of the two groups of patients were statistically analyzed, and the results showed that the observation group was significantly better (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The 10-day cardiac rehabilitation program for patients after acute myocardial infarction can effectively improve cardiac function and improve the quality of life.