International Journal of Clinical Research
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2022; 6: (1) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20220026 .
总浏览量: 575
西安爱尔眼科医院 陕西西安
西安爱尔眼科医院 陕西西安 中南大学爱尔眼科学院 湖南长沙
*通讯作者： 李康寯,单位：西安爱尔眼科医院 陕西西安 中南大学爱尔眼科学院 湖南长沙；
目的 分析有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入（implantable collamer lens，ICL）术人群角膜直径与前房角直径的一致性。方法 回顾性系列病例研究。选取2019年1月至12月于西安爱尔眼科医院屈光中心行ICL患者160例160眼，分别用Pentacam、Topolyzer、IOL Master500及规尺测量角膜直径（White-to-white measurement, WTW）；HD-OCT测量前房角直径（Angle-to-angle diameter, ATA）。以HD-OCT测量ATA值及ACD值为依据计算（STAAR系统）ICL型号尺寸，根据ICL晶体型号将受检者分为4组（12.1、12.6、13.2、13.7），4组内ATA与WTW分别进行Pearson相关、组内相关系数（ICC）法及Bland-Altman法分析。结果 4种型号ICL植入术后6月拱高分别为305.41±45.22μm、417.61±101.27μm、486.37±83.82μm、597.41±185.25μm；4组内ATA与4种仪器测量的WTW值间两两配对差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.01）；4组内ATA与WTW值间ICC为0.619-0.898；12.6和13.2组ATA与WTW之间存在强相关(r=0.718-0.881，0.816-0.868；P＜0.01)，12.1和13.7组ATA与WTW之间存在弱相关 (r=0.641-0.724，0.621-0.694；P＜0.01)。结论 以ATA为基础计算的ICL术后拱高预测性可，12.6和13.2型号的ATA与WTW测量一致性佳。
Objective To analyze the consistency of corneal diameter and anterior chamber diameter in Phakic eyes with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation (implantable collamer lens, ICL). Methods Retrospective series of case studies. 160 cases (160 eyes) of ICL ametropia were performed in the refractive center of Xi'an Aier Eye Hospital from January to December 2019. The corneal diameter (White-to-white measurement, WTW) was measured with Pentacam, Topolyzer, IOL Master500 and ruler before operation. The diameter of anterior chamber (Angle-to-angle diameter, ATA) was measured by HD-OCT. Based on the values of ATA and ACD measured by HD-OCT, ICL implantation was performed by on-line calculation (STAAR system). According to the models of ICL lens implanted, all patients were divided into 4 groups (12.1,12.6,13.2,13.7). WTW and ATA in the four groups were analyzed by Pearson correlation, intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. Results The average vault of the four models 6 months after ICL implantation were 305.41 ±45.22 μm, 417.61 ±101.27 μm, 486.37 ±83.82μm and 597.41 ±185.25μm,There was significant difference between ATA and WTW measured by four kinds of instruments in pairwise pairs among the four groups (P< 0.01). The ICC between ATA and WTW in 4 groups is 0.619-0.898. There was a strong correlation between ATA and WTW in 12.6 and 13.2 groups (r = 0.718-0.881, 0.816-0.868, P < 0.01). There was a weak correlation between ATA and WTW in groups 12.1 and 13.7 (r = 0.641-0.724 ,0.621-0.694, P < 0.01). Conclusion s The postoperative average vault of ICL calculated on the basis of ATA is ideal and predictable, 12.6,13.2 models of ATA and WTW have good consistency in measurement.
[1] Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, et al. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) for moderate to high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96(3): 409-412
[2] 李康寯, 张凌子, 宋小翠, 等. SMILE和ICL矫正中低度近视术后角膜前后表面和总角膜高阶像差的变化. 国际眼科杂志 2018; 18(12): 2289-2292
[3] Li K, Wang Z, Zhang D, et al. Visual outcomes and corneal biomechanics after V4c implantable collamer lens implantation in subclinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46(10): 1339-1345
[4] 张可，王姗姗，宋小翠，等.有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体水平或垂直植入术后前房角与拱高变化.国际眼科杂志2021；21（6）：1091-1095
[5] Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Kamiya K, et al. Relationship between ciliary sulcus diameter and anterior chamber diameter and corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36(4): 617-624
[6] Nakamura T, Isogai N, Kojima T, et al. Implantable collamer lens sizing method based on swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 187: 99-107
[7] Oh J, Shin HH, Kim JH, et al. Direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by 35-megahertz ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology 2007; 114(9): 1685-1688
[8] Kojima T, Yokoyama S, Ito M, et al. Optimization of an implantable Collamer lens sizing method using highfrequency ultrasound biomicroscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153(4): 632-637
[9] Kohnen T, Thomala MC, Cichocki M, et al. Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32(11): 1809-1813
[10] 刘波, 廖萱, 兰长骏, 等. 扫频光相干断层扫描生物测量仪测量健康人眼球生物学参数的重复性和再现性 .中华实验眼科杂志,2019；37 (11): 921-925
[11] Goldsmith JA, Li Y, Chalita MR, et al. Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(2): 238-244
[12] Oleszko AA, Marek JJ, Muzyka-Woźniak MM. Horizontal and anterior chamber diameter for phakic intraocular lens sizing. Clin Exp Optom 2020.
[13] Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Lisa C, et al. Long-term evaluation of the central vault after phakic Collamer® lens (ICL) implantation using OCT. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012; 250(12): 1807-1812
[14] Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, et al. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30(2): 374-380
[15] Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh MH, Zamani M, et al. Comparison of Horizontal corneal diameter measurements using the Orbscan IIz and Pentacam HR systems. Cornea 2013; 32(11): 1460-1464
[16] 王晓睿, 史强, 刘钊, 等. IOLmaster、Pentacam和Sirius测量角膜直径的一致性评估. 临床医学研究与实践 2020; 5(5): 121-123
[17] 张小兰, 龚芮, 王顺清, 等. 五种检查仪器对角膜水平直径测量的对比分析. 国际眼科杂志 2019; 19(4): 704-708
[18] 霍敏灼, 梁先军, 何锦贤, 等. 数码裂隙灯照相系统、数显卡尺、Pentacam眼前节分析系统及IOLMaster测量角膜水平直径的比较. 眼科新进展 2018; 38(10): 986-989, 994
[19] Choi KH, Chung SE, Chung TY, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy for determining visian implantable contact lens length in phakic IOL implantation. J Refract Surg 2007; 23(4): 362-367
[20] Nemeth G, Hassan Z, Szalai E, et al. Comparative analysis of white-to-white and angle-to-angle distance measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36(11): 1862-1866
[21] Baikoff G, Jitsuo Jodai H, Bourgeon G. Measurement of the internal diameter and depth of the anterior chamber: IOLMaster versus anterior chamber optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31(9): 1722-1728
[22] 徐婷, 王静, 陶黎明. 高度近视人群不同前房深度下水平睫状沟直径与角膜直径及前房角直径的相关性研究. 临床眼科杂志 2020; 28(2): 133-138
[23] Gao J, Liao RF, Li N. Ciliary sulcus diameters at different anterior chamber depths in highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39(7): 1011-1016
[24] 陈仪乐, 杨雅童, 陈宏杰, 等. 散瞳对中心孔型V4c ICL植入术后拱高及 前房深度的影响. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(7): 506-510. DOI: 10.3760/ cma.j.cn115909-20190917-00251.
[25] 陶思思, 王华, 刘鹏飞, 等. 水平角膜直径和前房直径与睫状沟直径的相关性研究. 国际眼科杂志, 2019; 19(6): 1031-1034
[26] Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476): 307-310
[27] 应桂双，梁远波，等. 眼科临床研究中双眼数据的处理． 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志，2017；19( 7) : 390-393
[28] Fea AM, Annetta F, Cirillo S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and Orbscan assessment of the anterior chamber. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31(9): 1713-1718
[29] Hickson-Curran S, Brennan NA, Igarashi Y, et al. Comparative evaluation of Asian and white ocular topography. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91(12): 1396-1405
[30] 王红霞, 彭艳丽, 赵中秀, 等. 有晶状体眼人工晶状体后房方位与拱高的相关性. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(10): 738-743.