International Journal of Clinical Research
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2022; 6: (1) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20220009 .
总浏览量: 635
广西维岭灿生物科技有限公司 广西南宁
*通讯作者: 赵莛,单位:广西维岭灿生物科技有限公司 广西南宁;
目的 评估电化学发光法及免疫荧光法在降钙素原检测中的性能。方法 收集血清样本255份,分别采用电化学发光法、免疫荧光法进行检测,以免疫荧光法作为参考系统,对电化学发光法分别进行精密度、正确性、相关性以及一致性分析。结果 电化学免疫荧光分析仪检测PCT精密度的变异系数<10%,与厂家的声明具有一致性。电化学免疫荧光分析仪检测结果的均值为16.34ng/ml,免疫荧光检测仪检测结果的均值为15.55ng/ml,百分偏倚为-11.05%,百分偏倚的标准差为14.87%。百分偏倚置信区间为-1.53%~-20.57%,覆盖了声明的±15%的百分偏倚。电化学发光法以及免疫荧光法检测总体及各个区间内的数据在P<0.01水平上明显相关(y=0.861x+0372,R2=0.960)。采用Kappa检验分析电化学发光法与免疫荧光法检测数据之间的一致性,Kappa值为0.92。结论 电化学免疫荧光分析仪精密度良好,与免疫荧光检测系统偏倚性较小,相关性以及一致性均良好,临床上可以根据具体情况选取适宜的检测方法。
Objective To evaluate the performance of electrochemiluminescence and immunofluorescence in the detection of procalcitonin. Methods: 255 serum samples were collected and detected by electrochemiluminescence method and immunofluorescence method respectively. Using immunofluorescence method as a reference system, the precision, correctness, correlation and consistency of electrochemiluminescence method were analyzed respectively. Results: The coefficient of variation of the precision of PCT detected by electrochemical immunofluorescence analyzer was less than 10%, which was consistent with the manufacturer's statement. The mean value of electrochemical immunofluorescence analyzer was 16.34ng/ml, the mean value of immunofluorescence analyzer was 15.55ng/ml, the percentage bias was -11.05%, and the standard deviation of the percentage bias was 14.87%. The percent bias confidence interval ranged from -1.53% to -20.57%, covering the stated percent bias of ±15%. The data detected by electrochemiluminescence and immunofluorescence methods were significantly correlated at the level of P<0.01 (y=0.861x+0372, R2=0.960). The Kappa test was used to analyze the consistency between the data detected by electrochemiluminescence and immunofluorescence, and the Kappa value was 0.92. Conclusion : Electrochemical immunofluorescence analyzer has good precision, less bias with immunofluorescence detection system, and good correlation and consistency. In clinical practice, appropriate detection methods can be selected according to specific conditions.
[1] 罗玲,商雨,汪宏才,等.间接免疫荧光法测定新城疫病毒滴度的研究[J].中国家禽,2021,43(12):102-105.
[2] 张勇,刘润森,张明智,等.血清肿瘤标志物甲胎蛋白与相应抗体的反应机制及其在放射免疫分析法中的应用[J].肿瘤基础与临床,2021,34(05):443-444.
[3] 范艳佳,陈美红,颜林林.化学发光免疫法在肿瘤生物标志物检测中的应用价值[J].实用预防医学, 2021, 28(11): 1397-1400.
[4] 李登红,陆建伟,王洪涛,等. 基于时间分辨免疫荧光法与电化学发光法对降钙素原检测项目的临床一致性评价[J]. 医疗装备,2020,33(1):42-44.
[5] 鲁礡. 全自动POCT免疫定量分析系统检测降钙素原与 罗氏电化学发光可比性研究[J]. 系统医学, 2017, 2(21): 39-41.
[6] 靳锐玉,朱奇峰.免疫荧光法与电化学发光法对降钙素原检测的临床性能一致性评价[J].临床医药实践, 2018, 27(08): 602-605.
[7] 降钙素原急诊临床应用专家共识组. 降钙素原(PCT)急诊临床应用的专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2012, 21(9): 944-951.
[8] 张延蕊,杨坤,马玉静.降钙素原早期诊断脓毒血症的价值[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2014,28:910-911.
[9] 李秉忠. 免疫比浊法与免疫荧光定量分析法测量血清降钙素原比较[J]. 中外医学研究,2015(21):68-69.
[10] 廖德权. 基于量子点标记的降钙素原快速、高灵敏荧光免疫层析检测方法的建立及应用[J]. 数理医药学杂志,2021,34(10):1425-1429.
[11] 吴金斌,郑若洋,欧嘉文.定量检测降钙素原的方法学评价[J].检验医学与临床,2015,12(06):780-782.
[12] 张永恒. 重症监护室电化学发光法测定血清降钙素原对感染患者的诊断作用探讨[J]. 养生保健指南, 2018(45): 229.
[13] 孙丽丽. Roche Cobas E411电化学发光分析仪检测降钙素原的方法学性能评估[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(2):56,130.