[email protected]

国际护理学研究

International Journal of Nursing Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2021; 3: (4) ; 10.12208/j.ijnr. 20210100 .

Application of two kinds of core temperature monitoring methods in target temperature management of patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
2种核心温度监测方法在体外膜肺氧合患者目标温度管理中的应用

作者: 何芝 *, 肖素飞, 王庆云, 周姓良

南方医科大学顺德医院重症医学科 广东佛山

*通讯作者: 何芝,单位:南方医科大学顺德医院重症医学科 广东佛山;

收录截图(CNKI-Scholar)

引用本文: 何芝, 肖素飞, 王庆云, 周姓良 2种核心温度监测方法在体外膜肺氧合患者目标温度管理中的应用[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2021; 3: (4) : 33-37.
Published: 2021/8/31 9:19:54

摘要

目的 比较体外膜肺氧合(extracorporealmembrane oxygenation, ECMO)患者鼻咽部和变温水箱两种核心温度监测方法的差异及相关性,为ECMO患者进行目标温度管理时核心温度监测提供更稳定可靠的方法。方法 选取2018年2月-2019年5月广东某三级医院重症医学科进行ECMO支持的患者作为研究对象,分别对同一患者同时采用鼻咽温度和变温水箱2种方式监测每小时目标温度维持期核心体温,比较2种方法的差异和相关性。结果 共纳入ECMO支持患者28例,男19例,女9例,其中鼻咽部测得温度为33.20(33.10,33.30)℃,变温水箱测得温度为33.00(33.00,33.10)℃,总体鼻咽部比变温水箱测得温度高(0.11±0.08)℃,两种方法比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=8.392,P<0.01),但均在目标温度管理范围内。两种方法测定核心体温的Spearman相关系数为0.824(P<0.01)呈高度正相关,Bland-Altman分析显示,2种监测方法测得体温一致性较高,平均差值为0.11℃(t=9.34,P<0.01,95%CI为(-0.047-0.266)。结论 变温水箱作为ECMO装置的一部分,其监测的目标温度维持期膜肺血液温度与鼻咽温度结果有差异,但相关性和一致性良好,为测量ECMO患者核心温度提供了新方法,且获得方便,对患者无损伤。

关键词: 体外膜肺氧合;核心温度;体温监测;目标温度管理;鼻咽温度

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the difference and correlation between two kinds of core temperature monitoring methods of nasopharyngeal and variable temperature water tank in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO),and to provide a more stable and reliable method for core temperature monitoring during target temperature management.
Methods Patients with ECMO support admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Guangdong Province From February 2018 to May 2019 were selected . Nasopharyngeal temperature and variable temperature water tank were used to monitor the core temperature during the target temperature maintenance period of each hour at the same time for every patient, and the differences and correlations of two methods were compared.
Results A total of 28 patients with ECMO were included,including 19 males and 9 females. statistically significant was found between nasopharyngeal temperature with 33.20(33.10,33.30)℃ and variable temperature water tank with 33.00(33.00,33.10)℃.The total temperature of nasopharynx was (0.11 ± 0.08) ℃ higher than variable temperature water tank,but both were within the target temperature management range.Correlation analysis showed that the Spearman correlation coefficient of the 2 methods was 0.824 (P<0.01),which have a significantly positive correlation.
Conclusion   The results of blood temperature of membranous lung and nasopharynx in the target temperature maintenance period are different, but the correlation and consistency are satisfactory.As a part of ECMO device, It provides a new method to measure the core temperature of ECMO patients, which is convenient and non-invasive.

Key words: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Core Temperature; Temperature Monitoring; Target Temperature Management; Nasopharyngeal temperature

参考文献 References

[1] Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132 (18 Suppl 2): S315-367.

[2] Schenone AL,Cohen A,Patarroyo G, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: a systematic review/ meta-analysisexploring the impact of expanded criteria and targeted temperature[J]. Resuscitation,2016,108:102-110.

[3] 成人急危重症脑目标温度管理临床实践专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019,(03):282-291.

[4] 蒋守银, 张茂. 心脏骤停后应用目标性体温管理的加拿大联合指南[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2016,25(1):66-67.

[5] Arrich J, Holzer M, Havel C, et al. Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 2:CD004128.

[6] Pawley MD, Martinsen P, Mitchell SJ, et al. Brachial arterial temperature as an indicator of core temperature: proof of concept and potential applications[J]. J Extra Corpor Technol, 2013,45(2):86-93.

[7] 郭丽波, 王常松, 李恩有. 术中核心温度监测研究进展[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2014,35(7):631-633,650.

[8] 刘博, 唐晓英, 刘伟峰, 等. 人体核心温度的测量方法研究进展[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2017, 36(5): 608-614.

[9] 心脏骤停后目标温度管理共识专家组. 心脏骤停后目标温度管理专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2016, 25(8): 1000-1006.

[10] 张玉曼, 宋春霞, 郑晓丽, 等. 心搏骤停患者目标体温管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(04): 621-627.

[11] 胡月, 王心涛, 崔德荣. 目标温度管理在成人心脏停搏患者中的应用[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2018, 30(5): 490-493.

[12] Engelman R, Baker RA, Likosky DS, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Bypass--Temperature Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015, 100(2): 748-757.

[13] 郭震, 李欣. 2015年中国体外循环温度管理调查报告[J]. 中国体外循环杂志, 2016,14(04):200-204.

[14] 吴岚, 章晓华, 杨满青, 等. 体外心肺复苏联合亚低温治疗在先天性心脏病术后患者中的应用[J]. 中国体外循环杂志, 2018,16(04):241-244.

[15] 韩劲松, 王婷婷, 田竞, 等. 创伤性低体温伤员体外膜肺复温标准研究[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2020, 41(01): 11-18.

[16] 谢娟玉, 李乐之. 重症监护病人体温监测方式的综合评价[J]. 全科护理, 2017,15(01):20-22.

[17] Nussmeier NA, Cheng W, Marino M, et al. Temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass: the discrepancies between monitored sites[J]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 103(6): 1373-1379.

[18] 马莉, 杜兰芳, 马青变, 等. 北京市护理人员对心脏骤停患者目标体温管理的现状调查[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019,54(9):1373-1378.