Comparison of the effect of interventional therapy and medical therapy in ischemic cerebrovascular disease
介入治疗与内科治疗在缺血性脑血管病中的应用效果比较

摘要

目的 对比介入治疗与内科治疗在缺血性脑血管病中的应用效果。方法 为了深入了解介入治疗和内科治疗的治疗效果，本次研究将本院的80例缺血性脑血管病患者纳入到研究中，采用双盲分组法将其分为对照组和观察组各40例，在研究中分别采用常规内科治疗和血管内介入治疗的方式，最终采用统计学软件对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果 经对比发现，观察组患者的血管狭窄率＜50%的患者更多，治疗效果明显高于对照组，且观察组的椎动脉和基底动脉收缩期流速在治疗后明显优于对照组，组间差异较大，符合统计学意义的评判标准（P＜0.05）。结论 于缺血性脑血管病患者治疗中选择内科治疗的方式可以有效的提升患者的治疗效果，改善其脑部症状，值得临床推广。

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of interventional therapy and medical therapy in ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Methods: In order to gain a deeper understanding of the therapeutic effects of interventional therapy and medical treatment, 80 patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease in our hospital were included in this study, and they were divided into control group and observation group by double-blind grouping method. For 40 cases, the methods of conventional medical treatment and intravascular interventional treatment were used in the study. Finally, statistical software was used to compare the treatment effects of the two groups of patients.
Results: After comparison, it was found that more patients in the observation group had a vascular stenosis rate of less than 50%, and the treatment effect was significantly higher than that of the control group. The systolic flow velocity of the vertebral artery and basilar artery in the observation group was significantly better than the control group after treatment. The difference between the groups is large, which meets the criterion of statistical significance (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : The choice of medical treatment in the treatment of patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease can effectively improve the treatment effect of patients and improve their brain symptoms. It is worthy of clinical promotion.