[email protected]

国际护理学研究

International Journal of Nursing Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2021; 3: (2) ; 10.12208/j.ijnr. 20210046 .

Main reasons and countermeasures affecting the quality of hepatobiliary surgery
影响肝胆外科护理质量的主要原因与应对措施

作者: 殷登琴, 郭先梅 *

贵州医科大学附属医院肝胆外科 贵州贵阳

*通讯作者: 郭先梅,单位:贵州医科大学附属医院肝胆外科 贵州贵阳;

收录截图(CNKI-Scholar)

引用本文: 殷登琴, 郭先梅 影响肝胆外科护理质量的主要原因与应对措施[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2021; 3: (2) : 28-30.
Published: 2021/3/26 17:42:07

摘要

目的 分析影响肝胆外科护理质量的主要原因与应对措施。方法 为进一步提升肝胆外科护理质量,于其中选取90例患者作为实验研究对象,均存在预后不同类型的肝胆疾病,符合实验入组标准,同时在入组后将90例患者随机分配为使用不同护理方法的对照组和观察组,每组45例患者,前者依然实施常规护理,后者则在明确影响肝胆外科护理质量的主要原因后采取针对性的质量控制措施,并对比两种不同护理模式下的不良事件发生率以及家属满意度。结果 从实验结果来看,观察组在实施针对性质控措施后,仅出现2例不良事件,不良事件发生率4.44%;对照组则出现7例不良事件,发生率15.56%,对比来看观察组不良事件发生率明显低于对照组,(P<0.05)。其次,观察组患者满意度也更高于对照组,(P<0.05)。结论 影响肝胆外科护理质量的原因较多,通过实施针对性的质量控制措施可有效降低风险事件发生率。

关键词: 肝胆外科;护理质量;影响因素;应对措施

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the main reasons and countermeasures that affect the quality of hepatobiliary surgery. Method: In order to further improve the quality of hepatobiliary surgery care, 90 patients were selected as experimental research subjects, all of whom have different types of hepatobiliary diseases with different prognosis, and meet the experimental entry criteria. At the same time, 90 patients were randomly assigned to use different The control group and observation group of nursing methods have 45 patients in each group. The former still carries out routine nursing, while the latter adopts targeted quality control measures after identifying the main reasons affecting the quality of hepatobiliary surgery care, and compares two different nursing models The incidence of adverse events and family satisfaction.
Results: According to the experimental results, after the implementation of specific control measures, there were only 2 adverse events in the observation group, with an adverse event rate of 4.44%; in the control group, there were 7 adverse events with a rate of 15.56%. Look at the observations by comparison The incidence of adverse events in the group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Secondly, the satisfaction of patients in the observation group was also higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : There are many reasons that affect the quality of hepatobiliary surgery. The implementation of targeted quality control measures can effectively reduce the incidence of risk events.

Key words: Hepatobiliary Surgery; Nursing Quality; Influencing Factors; Countermeasures

参考文献 References

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]