Physiological and psychological nursing of elderly patients in cardiology department
心内科老年患者的生理及心理护理

摘要

目的 探究在心内科老年患者中实施生理及心理护理干预的效果。方法 本研究开始时间为2019年10月，结束时间为2020年9月，研究期间选择在我院心内科接受治疗的老年患者共计70例作为主要分析对象，为了深入了解老年患者的生理及心理护理方法和效果，本次使用对比的研究方法，将所有的患者依据1:1的比例分为两组，分别命名为对照组（采用常规护理方法，n=35例）、观察组（在对照组护理的基础上采用生理及心理护理干预，n=35例），不同方法护理后观察和分析患者的临床情况，并记录护理期间的相关数据，主要包括：护理前后患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪评分、护理满意度等数据，同时将两组统计后的数据进行比较。结果 护理前两组患者无论是焦虑情绪评分，还是抑郁情绪评分相比，均无明显区别，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；护理后两组的情绪状况均发生了良好的改变，相比护理前有明显优势，其中观察组的优势高于护理前和对照组，差异显著有统计学意义，用（P＜0.05）表示。80.0%（28/35）、94.29%（33/35）分别是对照组和观察组护理后的满意度，相比之下前者低于后者，有明显差异和统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 在心内科老年患者的护理工作中，采用生理及心理护理干预方法，能够有效地改善患者的情绪状态，对其生活质量的提高有着积极作用，值得临床应用和推广。

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of physical and psychological nursing interventions in elderly patients in the Department of Cardiology.
Methods: The study started in October 2019 and ended in September 2020. During the study, a total of 70 elderly patients who were treated in the cardiology department of our hospital were selected as the main analysis objects, in order to understand the physiology and psychology of elderly patients. Nursing methods and effects, using the comparative research method this time, all patients were divided into two groups according to a ratio of 1:1, named as the control group (using conventional nursing methods, n=35 cases), the observation group (in the control On the basis of group nursing, physical and psychological nursing interventions were used, n=35 cases). After different methods of nursing, the patient’s clinical condition was observed and analyzed, and relevant data during nursing was recorded, including: patients’ anxiety and depression scores before and after nursing, Nursing satisfaction and other data, and compare the two statistical data.
Results: There was no significant difference between the anxiety scores and depression scores of the two groups of patients before nursing, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); the emotional status of the two groups after nursing changed well. Compared with pre-nursing, it has obvious advantages. Among them, the advantage of observation group is higher than that of pre-nursing and control group. The difference is statistically significant, which is represented by (P<0.05). 80.0% (28/35) and 94.29% (33/35) are the satisfaction of the control group and the observation group after nursing. In contrast, the former is lower than the latter, with significant differences and statistical significance (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : In the nursing work of elderly patients in the cardiology department, the use of physiological and psychological nursing intervention methods can effectively improve the emotional state of the patients and have a positive effect on the improvement of their quality of life. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.