Clinical observation of comprehensive rehabilitation treatment for patients with hemiplegia in neurology department
神经内科偏瘫患者综合性康复治疗的临床观察

摘要

目的 对神经内科偏瘫患者治疗中综合性康复治疗的应用价值进行研究，以期能够为神经内科医护人员开展工作提供一些参考。方法 本次实验共计抽取本院2018年5月～2020年5月期间就诊的220例神经内科偏瘫患者，通过掷骰子的方法将所选患者分为甲组及乙组，两组患者人数一致，以110例患者为一组。在实验过程中，医护人员应通过常规康复治疗手段对甲组患者进行治疗，通过综合性康复治疗手段对乙组患者进行治疗，对两组患者治疗总有效率、患者生活质量评分及患者神经功能缺损评分进行记录和对比。结果 与甲组患者相比，乙组患者治疗总有效率较高，甲组患者治疗总有效率为81.82%，乙组患者治疗总有效率为94.55%，两组患者治疗总有效率方面表现出较大差异，数据呈现统计学意义（p＜0.05）；与甲组患者相比，乙组患者生活质量评分较高，甲组患者生活质量评分为（70.6±2.1）分，乙组患者生活质量评分为（89.3±2.9）分，两组患者生活质量评分方面表现出较大差异，数据呈现统计学意义（p＜0.05）；与甲组患者相比，乙组患者神经功能缺损评分较低，甲组患者神经功能缺损评分为（15.8±3.3）分，乙组患者神经功能缺损评分为（12.1±3.7）分，两组患者神经功能缺损评分之间表现出较大差异，数据呈现统计学意义（p＜0.05）。结论 在神经内科偏瘫患者治疗中综合性康复治疗有着较好的效果，其能够在一定程度上促进患者治疗总有效率及生活质量评分的提升，降低患者神经功能缺损评分，具有较高的临床价值。

Abstract

Objective: To study the application value of comprehensive rehabilitation therapy in the treatment of patients with neurological hemiplegia, with a view to providing some reference for the neuromedicine medical staff to carry out their work.
Methods: A total of 220 patients with neurological hemiplegia who visited our hospital from May 2018 to May 2020 were selected in this experiment. The selected patients were divided into Group A and Group B by rolling the dice. The number of patients in the two groups was the same , With 110 patients as a group. During the experiment, the medical staff should treat the patients in Group A through conventional rehabilitation treatment, and the patients in Group B through comprehensive rehabilitation treatment. The total treatment efficiency of the two groups of patients, the patient's quality of life score, and the patient's neurological function Defect scores are recorded and compared.
Results: Compared with the patients in group A, the total treatment efficiency of group B patients was higher. The total effective rate of treatment in group A patients was 81.82%, and the total effective rate of treatment in group B patients was 94.55%. There was a big difference, and the data showed statistical significance (p<0.05); compared with the patients in group A, the quality of life score in group B was higher, the quality of life score in group A was (70.6±2.1), the life in group B The quality score was (89.3±2.9) points, and the quality of life scores of the two groups showed significant differences, and the data showed statistical significance (p<0.05); compared with the patients in group A, the scores of neurological deficits in group B were lower The neurological deficit score of group A patients was (15.8±3.3) points, and the neurological deficit score of group B patients was (12.1±3.7) points. There was a large difference between the neurological deficit scores of the two groups of patients, and the data showed statistics Significance (p<0.05).
Conclusion  : Comprehensive rehabilitation treatment has a good effect in the treatment of patients with neurological hemiplegia. It can promote the improvement of the total treatment efficiency and quality of life score of the patient to a certain extent, reduce the patient's neurological deficit score, and has a higher clinical value.