International Journal of Nursing Research
International Journal of Nursing Research. 2020; 2: (3) 49; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20200115 .
总浏览量: 964
云南省第二人民医院心血管病中心内科
*通讯作者： 赵吉美,单位：云南省第二人民医院心血管病中心内科；
目的 对比探究持续护理质量改进措施在心内科临床中的应用效果。方法 随机抽取我院2019年3月-2020年1月收治的100例心内科患者作为研究主体，采用均分法将其具体分为观察组与对照组，观察组50例，对照组50例。给予对照组常规护理干预，而观察组患者将在常规护理的基础上实施持续护理质量改进，比较两组患者的护理纠纷率、护理质量评分以及负面情绪评分。结果 实施相应护理措施前，两组患者的护理效果比较差异较小，并无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；实施相应护理措施后，两组患者的护理效果比较差异显著，具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 研究表明，在常规护理干预的基础上实施持续护理质量赶紧措施能够有效促进心内科的整体护理服务质量，同时切实提高心内科患者的护理满意度，显著减低心内科临床的护理纠纷事件发生率，因此值得临床推广。
Objective To compare and explore the effect of continuous nursing quality improvement measures in clinical cardiology. Method Randomly select 100 cardiology patients admitted in our hospital from March 2019 to January 2020 as the main body of the study, and divide them into the observation group and the control group by the equal division method, 50 cases in the observation group and 50 cases in the control group . The control group was given routine nursing intervention, while the observation group patients will implement continuous nursing quality improvement on the basis of routine nursing, comparing the nursing dispute rate, nursing quality score and negative emotion score of the two groups of patients. Results Before implementing the corresponding nursing measures, the difference in the nursing effect between the two groups of patients was relatively small, and there was no statistical significance (P> 0.05); after implementing the corresponding nursing measures, the difference in the nursing effect between the two groups of patients was significant, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Research shows that implementing continuous nursing quality measures on the basis of routine nursing intervention can effectively promote the overall nursing service quality of cardiology, and at the same time effectively improve the nursing satisfaction of cardiology patients, significantly reduce the occurrence of clinical nursing disputes in cardiology Rate, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]