The application value of femoral artery approach and radial artery approach in patients undergoing cerebral angiography
经股动脉入路与经桡动脉入路在全脑血管造影术患者中的应用价值

摘要

目的 探究临床中针对全脑血管造影术病人实施治疗时，选用经股动脉入路与经桡动脉入路的价值。方法 从我院选取（2024年1月-2025年1月）接受治疗的全脑血管造影术病人110例展开分析，分组方法：随机数字表法，包括2组，对照组（n=52）：经股动脉入路，观察组（n=58）：应用经桡动脉入路。两组对比分析手术期间各项指标；并发症发生情况。结果 手术期间各项指标两组对比分析，穿刺时间两组中观察组较长（P<0.05）。和对照组展开比较分析，并发症发生率观察组较低（P<0.05）。结论 全脑血管造影术患者应用经桡动脉入路的效果优于经股动脉入路，手术时间较短，术后并发症发生率较低，且患者生活质量评分较高，利于患者预后改善，作用确切，值得临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of femoral artery approach and radial artery approach in the treatment of patients undergoing cerebral angiography in clinical practice.
Methods A total of 110 patients who underwent cerebral angiography in our hospital from January 2024 to January 2025 were selected for analysis. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using the random number table method: the control group (n=52) with femoral artery approach and the observation group (n=58) with radial artery approach. The two groups were compared in terms of various indicators during the operation and the occurrence of complications.
Results During the operation, the puncture time in the observation group was longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The complication rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The radial artery approach is superior to the femoral artery approach in patients undergoing cerebral angiography, with shorter operation time, higher puncture and angiography success rates, lower postoperative complication rates, and higher quality of life scores, which is beneficial to the improvement of patient prognosis and has a definite effect, worthy of clinical promotion and application.