International Journal of Education
International Journal of Education. 2026; 8: (5) ; 10.12208/j.ije.20260126 .
总浏览量: 73
1青岛科技大学外国语学院 山东青岛
2山东交通职业学院 山东潍坊
*通讯作者： 孟婧,单位：青岛科技大学外国语学院 山东青岛; ；
工科院校大学英语课程建设需要回应学校办学定位、学科优势和产业人才培养需求。当前部分工科院校大学英语课程存在内容同质化、语言教学与专业学习衔接不够紧密、行业文化资源利用不足及评价方式单一等问题。本文以一所具有橡胶化工学科优势的省属理工类高校为考察对象，探讨行业特色文化引领下大学英语课程体系重构的路径，提出一核两翼三课程群框架：以橡胶品格为育人核心，以跨学科融合和数智教学为两翼，设置通识大学英语、工程专门用途英语和跨文化传播英语三个课程群，并提出校本资源建设、项目式任务设计、第二课堂实践和数智评价等实施路径，为同类工科院校开展校本化课程建设提供参考。
College English curriculum development in engineering universities should respond to institutional positioning, disciplinary strengths, and industrial talent cultivation needs. Currently, some engineering universities face problems including homogeneous content, weak links between language learning and disciplinary study, inadequate use of industry-specific cultural resources, and limited assessment approaches. Using a local engineering university with strengths in rubber and chemical engineering as a case, this paper discusses reconstructing the College English curriculum guided by industry-specific culture. It proposes a framework of one core, two wings, and three course clusters: centered on Rubber Character, with interdisciplinary integration and digital-intelligent teaching as supports, comprising general College English, English for engineering purposes, and intercultural communication English. Implementation approaches including school-based resource development, project-based task design, extracurricular practice, and digital-intelligent assessment are also discussed. The framework aims to strengthen connections between College English, industry culture, disciplinary learning, and global competence, offering reference for similar institutions.
[1] 教育部高等学校大学外语教学指导委员会. 大学英语教学指南：2020版[S]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2020.
[2] KLEIN J T. Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures: A Model for Strength and Sustainability[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
[3] COYLE D, HOOD P, MARSH D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[4] ROBERTSON R. Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity[C]//FEATHERSTONE M, LASH S, ROBERTSON R. Global Modernities. London: Sage Publications, 1995: 25-44.
[5] SIEMENS G. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age[J]. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2005, 2(1): 3-10.
[6] DAVIS F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13(3): 319-340.
[7] BAX S. CALL—Past, present and future[J]. System, 2003, 31(1): 13-28.
[8] FACIONE P A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction: The Delphi Report[R]. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 1990.
[9] 蔡基刚. 大学英语是通识教育还是专业教育？再论大学英语教学的专门用途英语定位[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022(3): 84-91.
[10] BELL S. Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future[J]. The Clearing House, 2010, 83(2): 39-43.
[11] 文秋芳. 构建产出导向法理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015, 47(4): 547-558.