[email protected]

当代护理

Contemporary Nursing

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Contemporary Nursing. 2026; 7: (9) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20260491 .

Analysis of risk factors for wake-up agitation during anesthesia and comprehensive nursing intervention
苏醒期躁动危险因素及综合护理干预分析

作者: 邝桂梅 *, 谢莉佳

广州市花都区人民医院麻醉手术中心 广东广州

*通讯作者: 邝桂梅,单位:广州市花都区人民医院麻醉手术中心 广东广州; ;

引用本文: 邝桂梅, 谢莉佳 苏醒期躁动危险因素及综合护理干预分析[J]. 当代护理, 2026; 7: (9) : 94-98.
Published: 2026/9/10 12:25:51

摘要

目的 分析麻醉苏醒期躁动的危险因素及综合护理干预效果。方法 选取2025年1月-2025年12月我院收治并接受全身麻醉手术的100例患者为研究对象,按护理方案分为对照组与观察组,每组50例。对照组实施常规麻醉复苏护理,观察组实施基于危险因素评估的综合护理干预;同时根据是否发生苏醒期躁动分为躁动组与非躁动组,分析危险因素。比较两组躁动发生率、复苏质量、管路相关事件和护理满意度。结果 100例患者苏醒期躁动发生率为22.00%。年龄≥60岁、术后疼痛评分≥4分、留置管路刺激、苏醒期低氧血症和术前焦虑是苏醒期躁动的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。观察组躁动发生率、拔管/管路牵拉事件和PACU停留时间均低于对照组,满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 麻醉苏醒期躁动与年龄、疼痛、管路刺激、低氧和焦虑等因素有关,基于危险因素的综合护理可降低躁动风险并改善复苏安全。

关键词: 麻醉苏醒期;躁动;危险因素;综合护理;复苏室

Abstract

Objective To analyze the risk factors for wake-up agitation during anesthesia and the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention.
Methods A total of 100 patients who underwent general anesthesia surgery and were admitted to our hospital from January 2025 to December 2025 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the nursing plan, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received routine anesthesia recovery nursing, while the observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention based on risk factor assessment; at the same time, the patients were divided into the agitation group and the non-agitation group according to whether wake-up agitation occurred, and the risk factors were analyzed. The incidence of wake-up agitation, recovery quality, pipeline-related events and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
Results The incidence of wake-up agitation in 100 patients was 22.00%. Age≥60 years old, postoperative pain score≥4 points, catheter-related irritation, wake-up hypoxemia and preoperative anxiety were independent risk factors for wake-up agitation (P<0.05). The incidence of agitation, catheter dislodgement events and PACU stay time in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the satisfaction rate was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Wake-up agitation during anesthesia is related to age, pain, catheter-related irritation, hypoxia and anxiety, and comprehensive nursing based on risk factors can reduce the risk of agitation and improve recovery safety.

Key words: Anesthesia wake-up; Agitation; Risk factors; Comprehensive nursing; Recovery room

参考文献 References

[1] 余燕玉.全身麻醉下介入手术患者发生术后苏醒期躁动的影响因素分析[J].福建医药杂志,2025,47(7):44-47.

[2] 魏灵利,蔡慧,姚盛云.全身麻醉苏醒期躁动防范性护理敏感指标的建立及基于卡诺模型的临床应用[J].全科护理,2025,23(2):311-317.

[3] 洪丽,陈峰.老年结肠癌腹腔镜手术麻醉苏醒期躁动的危险因素[J].浙江创伤外科,2023,28(1):177-179.

[4] 李欣,余瑞玲,岑锦泳,等.小儿全身麻醉后苏醒期躁动的危险因素分析及护理对策研究[J].国际护理学杂志,2022, 41(10):1751-1754.

[5] 甘思云,尹荣丽,陈丹丹.腹腔镜下结肠癌根治术患者麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响因素与干预措施分析[J].医学理论与实践,2021,34(24):4365-4367.

[6] 周琳,彭丽,姜丽芳,等.麻醉手术病人苏醒期躁动风险预测模型的构建研究[J].全科护理,2021,19(32):4571-4574.

[7] 孟令娟,吴苏,张红妍,等.术前访视联合多元化正向情感唤醒护理对HoLEP患者麻醉苏醒期躁动及应激反应的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2026,31(8):82-85.

[8] 吴文燕,谭嘉裕,黄哲燕,等.绿色通道下小儿腹腔镜疝修补术麻醉复苏期躁动的预警性护理干预研究[J].医学理论与实践,2026,39(7):1223-1226.

[9] 张睿.风险预警模型下护理干预对腹部手术患者麻醉苏醒期躁动和肺部感染的预防效果[J].现代养生,2026, 26(1):69-71.

[10] 刘巧玲,刘巧香,焦光辉.环节层次模式对全麻肿瘤手术患者苏醒期躁动的影响[J].河南医学研究,2025,34(17):3248-3251.