International Journal of Nursing Research
International Journal of Nursing Research. 2026; 8: (8) ; 10.12208/j.ijnr.20260428 .
总浏览量: 19
绍兴文理学院附属医院 浙江绍兴
*通讯作者： 裘万民,单位：绍兴文理学院附属医院 浙江绍兴; ；
目的 比较胃癌患者术后应用常规护理、量化评估策略指导下护理的临床效果，对术后胃肠功能恢复影响。方法 筛选2024年10月至2025年10月入院手术治疗60例胃癌患者为研究对象，开展临床研究；术前以盲选抽签结果分组，术后予以对照组（n=30）常规护理，予以研究组（n=30）常规护理、量化评估策略指导下护理联合干预，比较护理方法临床干预效果差异。结果 与对照组比，研究组术后胃肠功能恢复用时缩短，且并发症发生率降低，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。与对照组比，研究组护理后GSES评分升高，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 量化评估策略指导下护理的术后开展，可积极促进胃癌患者术后胃肠功能恢复，并在提升患者康复效能感同时，优化并发症预防效果。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of conventional nursing and nursing under the guidance of quantitative assessment strategies in patients with gastric cancer after surgery on the recovery of gastrointestinal function. Methods 60 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgical treatment from October 2024 to October 2025 were selected as the research subjects. A clinical study was conducted; preoperative grouping was done based on the results of blind selection and drawing lots, and postoperative the control group (n=30) received conventional nursing, and the research group (n=30) received conventional nursing and nursing under the guidance of quantitative assessment strategies combined intervention. The differences in clinical intervention effects of the nursing methods were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function after surgery in the research group was shortened, and the incidence of complications was reduced, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the GSES score of the research group after nursing increased, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The implementation of nursing under the guidance of quantitative assessment strategies after surgery can actively promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients with gastric cancer, and at the same time, improve the rehabilitation efficacy perception of patients and optimize the prevention effect of complications.
[1] 范静静,吴晓鹃,肖佩华,等. 基于互联网平台的4C延续性护理模式在胃癌术后病人家庭肠内营养中的应用[J]. 肠外与肠内营养,2025,32(2):101-106.
[2] 汤海琴,郑江,罗静枝. 基于ERAS理念手术室护理对腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者手术应激和预后康复效果的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2025,44(10):1745-1749.
[3] 李静妮,薛婷,王瑾,等. 行为改变整合理论的饮食护理在胃癌术后患者中的效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2025,44(19): 3561-3565.
[4] 吴青兰,康江荣,黄钦. 三联预康复护理策略对胃癌术后患者预后情况及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国临床护理,2025, 17(6):354-359.
[5] 陈珺,韩秀娟. 快速康复外科护理在胃癌胃大部切除术后患者中的应用效果分析[J]. 生命科学仪器,2025,23(5): 233-234,237.
[6] 张景转,马瑾. 综合镇痛护理联合个性化康复指导对腹腔镜胃癌术后患者心理状态、满意度及恢复情况的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2025,10(34):142-145.
[7] 陈莉茹,翟永华. 胃癌NOSES手术中细致护理配合对患者术后胃肠功能及并发症的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2024,43(22):4133-4137.
[8] 高亚玲,李燕,何芳. 中医特色护理对胃癌术后患者胃肠功能的影响[J]. 实用中医内科杂志,2023,37(2):104-106.
[9] 贺莎,林洁,王明英. ESPCS护理干预模式对腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者围术期应激反应及胃肠道功能的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2025,44(24):4493-4498.
[10] 丁莉,张丽,崔瑶. 量化评估护理方案对胃癌术后患者胃肠功能恢复、生活质量及护理满意度的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(20):56-59.