International Journal of Education
International Journal of Education. 2026; 8: (5) ; 10.12208/j.ije.20260122 .
总浏览量: 16
西华大学建筑与土木工程学院 四川成都
*通讯作者: 文洪,单位:西华大学建筑与土木工程学院 四川成都; ;
随着教育改革的推进,理工科重要基础课程“工程力学”课时缩减幅度普遍达到20%~53%。这对课程教学内容和教师课程设计等提出新的挑战。本文以西华大学2023-2025学年工程力学课程改革为实践载体,采用教学实践总结和改革前后对比,探讨了在课时大幅缩减背景下“工程力学”课程教学面临的主要问题。针对开课专业修订了A、B两套教学大纲,将88课时与56课时方案分别匹配不同专业需求;课堂采用案例与BOPPPS结合的教学设计,并利用雨课堂、学习通等平台把预习、复习和答疑延伸到课外;在信息化与在线资源利用方面,依托虚拟仿真平台开展模块化虚拟实验,学生接受度达87%。实践表明,学生期末成绩及格率较改革前提高约12%,课堂互动频次增长近30%。该研究结合教育改革需求提出了可操作性的教学设计与对策,为理工科基础课程的教学改革提供了实践经验和应用价值。
Engineering mechanics is a fundamental course in science and engineering education. However, with ongoing education reforms, class hours for “Engineering Mechanics” have been reduced by 20% to 53%, posing new challenges for course content delivery, students’ independent learning, and curriculum design. Taking the Engineering Mechanics curriculum reform implemented at Xihua University during the 2023–2025 academic years as a practical case, this study employs a synthesis of teaching practice and a pre- and post-reform comparative analysis to investigate the major challenges associated with substantial reductions in instructional hours. Two syllabi, namely Scheme A and Scheme B, were developed according to the requirements of different majors, with the 88-hour and 56-hour versions respectively tailored to specific disciplinary needs. In-class instruction incorporated engineering cases with the BOPPPS instructional design model, while platforms such as Rain Classroom and Xuexitong were used to extend previewing, review, and academic support beyond the classroom. In terms of digital and online resources, modular virtual experiments were implemented through a virtual simulation platform, with 87% of students expressing acceptance of this approach. The teaching practice showed that the pass rate of students' final examinations increased by approximately 12% compared with that before the reform, while the frequency of classroom interactions increased by nearly 30%. The findings provide practical and implementable instructional strategies for Engineering Mechanics under substantial reductions in teaching hours and offer useful practical experience and insights for the reform of fundamental courses in science and engineering programs.
[1] 杨未柱,樊哲铭,李磊,等. 融合增材制造技术的工程力学专业课程创新实验教学实践[J]. 大学教育, 2024, (8): 43-48.
[2] Jiyan Wang,Congcong Li. Research on Classroom Teaching Reform of Engineering Mechanics in Application-Oriented Universities[C]//2021 11th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME). Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 505-508.
[3] 毛贻齐,方棋洪. 大数据背景下“工程力学”课程互动学习平台研究[J]. 力学与实践, 2025, 47(2): 396-403.
[4] 李君筱. 从借鉴到自主创新:中国特色学分制的本土建构[J]. 现代教育科学, 2024, (4): 37-44.
[5] 曾永庆,刘晓红,胡卫东,等. 新工科背景下土木工程专业土力学课程实践教学的探讨[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2023, 6(24): 55-57.
[6] 崔宇,王义,刘蕾. 基于OBE理念“工程力学”课程教学设计[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2021, (19): 153-156.
[7] 王国斌,马婕,刘志军. 基于应用型人才培养的工程力学课程教学改革探索实践[J]. 大学教育, 2024, (4): 65-67+72.
[8] Jin-ru Ma,Rui-can Hao,Shang Wang. Reform and practice of digital teaching of engineering mechanics course under the background of “double high program”[C]//E-learning, E-education, and Online Training: 7th EAI International Conference, Eleot 2021, Xinxiang, China, June 20-21, 2021, Proceedings Part I. Cham: Springer, 2021: 15-22.
[9] 吴莹,徐志敏,张陵. 适应“新工科”人才培养需求的力学实验教学新模式[J]. 力学与实践, 2019, 41(1): 86-90.
[10] 曲淑英,周志新,吴江龙,等. 工程力学虚拟仿真实验教学中心资源建设[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2017, 36(12): 172-175.
[11] 宋益善,盛洁,康永锋. 有限课时下重要知识点CIS化提升有机化学基础课程教学质量的探讨[J]. 广东化工, 2022, 49(4): 235-236.
[12] 程培. 课时缩减背景下实变函数课程教学实践与探讨[J]. 贺州学院学报, 2019, 35(3): 133-135.
[13] 王劲,雷淑存,徐书洁. 课时缩减背景下工程图学课程的教学内容与教学方法探讨[J]. 中国现代教育装备, 2021, (17): 133-135.
[14] 刘柳,肖桐. 人工智能时代教育目标体系的延展与重塑——基于布鲁姆教育目标分类学的探索[J]. 电化教育研究, 2026, 47(7): 20-27.
[15] 周伟,钟闻. 基于BOPPPS教学模型的内涵与分析[J]. 大学教育, 2018, (1): 112-115.
[16] 武志伟,周耿,潘晨. 基于深度学习的任务驱动式翻转课堂教学实践[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2023, 42(2): 288-293.