[email protected]

现代护理医学杂志

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2026; 5: (8) ; 10.12208/j.jmnm.20260430 .

Practice of the 4+1 wound and stoma management model in postoperative care of patients with total cystostomy
4+1伤口造口管理模式在全膀胱造口患者术后护理中的实践

作者: 张丹 *

孝感市中心医院泌尿外科I 湖北孝感

*通讯作者: 张丹,单位:孝感市中心医院泌尿外科I 湖北孝感; ;

引用本文: 张丹 4+1伤口造口管理模式在全膀胱造口患者术后护理中的实践[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2026; 5: (8) : 112-114.
Published: 2026/8/12 9:23:48

摘要

目的 探究4+1伤口造口管理模式在全膀胱造口患者术后护理中的实践效果。方法 将2024年1月至2025年12月我院收治的66例全膀胱造口患者,随机分为观察组、对照组,各33例。对照组、观察组分别实施常规护理管理、4+1伤口造口管理模式。结果 在护理满意度方面,观察组为96.97%,对照组为81.82%,有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组精神健康、躯体功能、心理功能以及情感职能分别为(72.23±3.11)分、(73.54±3.72)分、(72.54±3.81)分、(73.11±2.85)分,观察组明显优于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 实施4+1伤口造口管理模式在全膀胱造口患者中,能够减少造口管理对日常生活的困扰,解决护理难点,保障患者居家生活的稳定性,值得参考。

关键词: “4+1”;伤口造口管理;全膀胱造口;术后护理

Abstract

Objective To explore the practical effects of the 4+1 wound stoma management model in postoperative care for patients with total cystostomy.
Methods A total of 66 patients with total cystostomy admitted to our hospital from January 2024 to December 2025 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 33 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing management, while the observation group was managed using the 4+1 wound stoma model.
Results In terms of nursing satisfaction, the observation group scored 96.97%, compared to 81.82% in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The observation group also showed significantly better scores in mental health, physical function, psychological function, and emotional role (72.23±3.11, 73.54±3.72, 72.54±3.81, and 73.11±2.85, respectively), all with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the control group.
Conclusion   Implementing the 4+1 wound stoma management model in patients with total cystostomy can reduce the impact of stoma management on daily life, address nursing challenges, and ensure the stability of patients’ home living, making it a valuable reference.

Key words: “4+1”; Wound and stoma management; Total cystostomy; Postoperative care

参考文献 References

[1] 陈华兰,陈亚萍,方芳. 基于自我决定全程化管理对泌尿造口患者的影响 [J]. 新疆医学, 2025, 55 (07): 885-888.

[2] 原晓婷,王李倩,弥长虹,等. 全程化延续性护理对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合腹壁造口患者自我管理、生活质量和造口并发症的影响 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2024, 5 (06): 1260-1265.

[3] 施丽敏,胡莘,汪薏,等. Teach-back法在膀胱造口患者自我管理中的应用效果分析 [J]. 浙江临床医学, 2023, 25 (04): 597-599.

[4] 赵艳超,朱笑丛,胡雅芳. 积极理念渗透式延续管理对膀胱癌尿流改道腹壁造口患者的效果观察 [J]. 河北医药, 2022, 44 (18): 2811-2814.

[5] 奉琴,刘玲,何其英,等. 互联网+自我管理模式对膀胱癌行回肠膀胱造口病人延续期生活质量的影响研究 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29 (10): 971-975.

[6] 汪蕾,李阿文,卢姗,等. 思维导图在回肠膀胱造口患者围手术期健康教育中的应用效果 [J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19 (09): 1535-1538+1614.

[7] 彭娅妮,刘秀芳,金璐. 基于微信平台的护理管理应用于行回肠膀胱造口膀胱癌患者中的效果 [J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2021, 7 (06): 181-183.

[8] 奉琴,冯先琼,何其英,等. 移动管理方案在膀胱癌行回肠膀胱造口患者中的应用研究 [J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28 (06): 61-64.

[9] 马乐. 延续性护理在膀胱造口患者中的应用 [J]. 河南医学高等专科学校学报, 2020, 32 (01): 76-79.