International Journal of Clinical Research
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2026; 10: (7) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20260348 .
总浏览量: 312
廊坊市安次区医院 河北廊坊
*通讯作者: 程时为,单位:廊坊市安次区医院 河北廊坊; ;
目的 分析老年急性脑梗死患者行静脉溶栓治疗的效果及安全性。方法 将2021年10月-2025年6月接收的62例老年急性脑梗死患者纳入研究,随机分为研究组与参照组,每组31例。参照组采取传统方法治疗,研究组采取静脉溶栓治疗,对比两组血管分级率、治疗前后的脑血管指标水平和不良反应出现率。结果 研究组血管3级率高于参照组(P<0.05),两组血管0、1、2级率均接近(P>0.05);治疗前,两组脑血管指标水平均较低(P>0.05),治疗后,两组脑血管指标水平均提高,研究组高于参照组(P<0.05);研究组不良反应出现率低于参照组(P<0.05)。结论 老年急性脑梗死患者行静脉溶栓治疗具有显著效果和较高的安全性。
Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 62 elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted from October 2021 to June 2025 were included in the study and randomly divided into the study group and the reference group, with 31 cases in each group. The reference group received traditional treatment, while the study group received intravenous thrombolysis. The vascular grade rate, the levels of cerebrovascular indicators before and after treatment, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The rate of vascular grade 3 in the study group was higher than that in the reference group (P < 0.05), and the rates of vascular grades 0, 1, and 2 in both groups were similar (P > 0.05); Before treatment, the levels of cerebrovascular indicators in both groups were low (P > 0.05), and after treatment, the levels of cerebrovascular indicators in both groups increased, with the study group higher than the reference group (P < 0.05); The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the reference group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Intravenous thrombolysis in elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction has significant efficacy and high safety.
[1] 岳晓燕,张艳芳.丁苯酞联合阿替普酶静脉溶栓对急性脑梗死患者神经功能缺损严重程度的影响观察[J].中国实用医药,2024,19(14):131-134.
[2] 闫雪,张帆,张蕾,等.急性脑梗死患者血清MECP2、GFAP与病情严重程度及静脉溶栓预后的关系[J].新疆医科大学学报,2024,47(08):1118-1123.
[3] 王亚静.2021年-2022年脑梗死阿替普酶溶栓患者住院人次及住院费用因素分析[J].中国病案,2024,25(07):77-79.
[4] 陈莲,张楠,刘利,等.机械血栓切除术联合静脉溶栓对中/重度急性脑梗死患者神经功能的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志,2023,51(07):833-836.
[5] 褚春沐.亚低温联合静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死患者的效果[J].中国民康医学,2023,35(12):17-20.
[6] 孙丹青.老年急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓治疗临床预后的影响因素分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2024,18(14):1-5.
[7] 高营礼,贾永林,张保华.机械介入取栓术联合阿替普酶静脉溶栓对急性脑梗死神经功能及TIMI分级的影响[J].罕少疾病杂志,2024,31(07):10-12.
[8] 张蕊,陈后勤,杨进平,等.多模式CT指导下动脉溶栓对急性致残性非大血管脑梗死患者氧化应激、炎症反应及神经功能的影响[J].临床误诊误治,2024,37(12):57-61,68.