Contemporary Nursing
Contemporary Nursing. 2026; 7: (7) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20260388 .
总浏览量: 16
江苏省徐州市中心医院放疗科 江苏徐州
*通讯作者： 乔万红,单位：江苏省徐州市中心医院放疗科 江苏徐州; ；
目的 明确对肺癌放疗这类人员实施基于团队管理模式的营养干预措施的突出点。方法 研究对象-我院接受放疗的肺癌患者群体，选取阶段-2024年6月至2025年6月，最终纳入人数-116例，分组试验划分标准-随机数字表法，形成每组均58例的对照组（常规饮食指导方案）、观察组（基于团队管理模式的营养干预方案），由此展开组间干预效果的对比，具体表现项目涵盖营养状态、毒副表现、生活质量。结果 代表营养状态的指标水平在干预后测定结果呈现为观察组更高，且营养风险筛查的评估结果呈现为观察组风险更（P<0.05）。对于毒副表现，发生人数占比最低是观察组，且这组的程度也更轻微（P<0.05）。生活质量各维度及综合评估分值在干预后显示观察组更高（P<0.05）。结论 对肺癌放疗这类人员实施基于团队管理模式的营养干预措施的突出点明确，首先营养状态方面的转变理想，其次还可以规避毒副反应，让这类人员的生活更有质量。
Objective To identify the salient points of implementing nutrition intervention measures based on a team management model for individuals undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer. Methods Study subjects - a cohort of lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in our hospital, study period - June 2024 to June 2025, final sample size - 116 cases, grouping criteria - random number table method, resulting in two groups of 58 cases each: the control group (receiving conventional dietary guidance) and the observation group (receiving nutrition intervention based on a team management model). The comparison of intervention effects between the groups was conducted, with specific outcomes including nutritional status, toxic side effects, and quality of life. Results The indicators representing nutritional status showed higher levels in the observation group after intervention, and the assessment results of nutritional risk screening indicated a higher risk in the observation group (P<0.05). Regarding toxic side effects, the observation group had the lowest proportion of cases and the severity of these effects was also milder (P<0.05). The dimensions of quality of life and the overall assessment scores were higher in the observation group after intervention (P<0.05). Conclusion The salient points of implementing nutrition intervention measures based on a team management model for individuals undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer are clear. Firstly, there is an ideal improvement in nutritional status, and secondly, it can avoid toxic side effects, enhancing the quality of life for these individuals.
[1] 秦秀容.护理干预对肺癌放疗患者不良反应的影响[J].中华肺部疾病杂志（电子版）,2017,10(1):77-78.
[2] 杨欢.优质护理套餐干预在肺癌术后辅助放疗患者中的应用效果[J].国际护理学杂志,2018,37(21):2940-2942.
[3] 赵晖,马筱慧,李宏伟,等.肿瘤患者化疗期间的饮食护理[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,4(1):214-214.
[4] 杨琴,陈典.不同营养支持对肿瘤化疗患者的影响[J].医学综述,2015,21(9):1686-1688.
[5] 骆海燕,姚红梅,郑亚华,等.综合营养干预对消化道肿瘤化疗病人营养状况及生存质量的影响1）[J].护理研究,2014,2(24):2961-2964.
[6] 杨月欣,张环美.《中国居民膳食指南(2016)》简介[J].营养学报,2016,38(3):209-217.
[7] 魏立君,安广权,王甦.NRS2002量表在恶性肿瘤手术患者营养筛查及评估中的作用[J].中国老年学杂志,2016, 36(23):5901-5902.
[8] 抗癌药急性及亚急性毒性反应分度标准(WHO标准)[J]. 癌症,1992,2(3):254.
[9] 郝元涛,方积乾.世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表中文版介绍及其使用说明[J]. 现代康复,2000,4(8):1127-1129.
[10] 骆海燕,姚红梅,郑亚华,等.消化道肿瘤患者化疗前营养状况及其与生活质量的关系[J].解放军护理杂志,2014, (16):13-16.
[11] 丛明华,李淑娈,程国威等.营养支持小组对于食管癌同步放化疗患者作用的研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2014,4(18): 1158-1162.
[12] 周婉,许勤,言克莉,等.消化道肿瘤化疗患者营养状况与生活质量及化疗不良反应的相关性分析[J].护理学报, 2015,2(9):1-4.