Contemporary Nursing
Contemporary Nursing. 2026; 7: (7) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20260355 .
总浏览量: 20
中国人民解放军海军第九七一医院崂山医疗区血液净化室 山东青岛
*通讯作者: 高萌萌,单位:中国人民解放军海军第九七一医院崂山医疗区血液净化室 山东青岛; ;
目的 探讨人工智能(AI)辅助决策支持系统在血液透析患者容量管理与干体重评估中的应用价值。方法 前瞻性选取2024年6月至2025年12月在本院接受维持性血液透析的18例患者,随机分为观察组(AI辅助决策支持系统+常规管理,n=9)与对照组(常规管理,n=9),连续治疗6个月。比较两组干体重评估准确性、容量管理指标、实验室指标及不良反应。结果 观察组干体重评估符合率高于对照组,透析间期体质量增长率低于对照组(P<0.05);治疗后,观察组血红蛋白、血钙水平高于对照组,血磷、血肌酐、尿素氮、甲状旁腺激素水平低于对照组,Kt/V高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组透析中低血压、肌肉痉挛发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 AI辅助决策支持系统可提高血液透析患者干体重评估准确性,优化容量管理,改善实验室指标,降低不良反应风险。
Objective To investigate the application value of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision support system in volume management and dry weight assessment for patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods A total of 18 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis in our hospital from June 2024 to December 2025 were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to an observation group (AI-assisted decision support system plus conventional management, n=9) and a control group (conventional management alone, n=9). All patients received continuous treatment for six months. The two groups were compared in terms of dry weight assessment accuracy, volume management-related indicators, laboratory parameters, and adverse events. Results The observation group had a higher rate of accurate dry weight assessment and a lower rate of inter-dialytic weight gain compared with the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the observation group showed higher levels of hemoglobin and serum calcium, lower levels of serum phosphorus, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and intact parathyroid hormone, and a higher Kt/V value compared with the control group (all P<0.05). The incidence of intradialytic hypotension and muscle cramps was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The AI-assisted decision support system can improve the accuracy of dry weight assessment, optimize volume management, enhance relevant laboratory parameters, and reduce the risk of adverse events in hemodialysis patients.
[1] 方妮娜,章海芬,陶幸娟,等.基于人体成分分析的目标式容量管理在维持性血液透析患者中的应用[J].上海护理,2025,25(9):61-64.
[2] 杨晓莉,王欣,王雯雯,等.维持性血液透析病人干体重预测方程的构建和验证[J].护理研究,2020,34(18):3185-3189.
[3] 杨晓莉,王欣,王雯雯,等.维持性血液透析病人容量超负荷的影响因素研究[J].护理研究,2021,35(11):1993-1996.
[4] 彭颖,杨超然,于广军.基于人工智能的临床辅助决策支持系统问责制度探索[J].海军军医大学学报,2025,46(8): 963-969.
[5] 闵宝妹,殷鹭,程静,等.人体成分分析仪评估干体重对维持性血透患者容量控制的影响[J].实用临床医学,2023, 24(6):78-81,88.
[6] 关萍.血液透析信息系统在患者管理和护理管理中的临床获益及展望[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2023,30(6): 765-768.
[7] 陈雯琳.人体成分分析仪结合量表评估策略用于低血压透析患者干体重评估中的价值研究[J].临床医学工程, 2025,32(5):535-538.
[8] 黄健,刘畅,闵亚丽,等.应用人体成分分析仪评估干体重对维持性血液透析患者顽固性高血压的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(10):1557-1559.
[9] 姚石燕,沈华娟,董永泽,等.人工智能在维持性血液透析患者动静脉内瘘管理中的应用进展[J].中国血液净化,2025,24(2):149-152.