Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2026; 5: (6) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20260323 .
总浏览量: 110
新疆维吾尔自治区第六人民医院(自治区传染病医院)综合内科 新疆乌鲁木齐
*通讯作者: 任秋菊,单位:新疆维吾尔自治区第六人民医院(自治区传染病医院)综合内科 新疆乌鲁木齐; ;
经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影(Coronary Angiography, CAG)及介入治疗(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, PCI)已成为主流术式,其优势包括术后患者可早期活动、出血并发症少及舒适度提高。术后穿刺点的有效止血是护理关键,充气式桡动脉止血器(如TR-Band)因其压力可控、操作标准而被广泛应用。然而,止血器的加压时长是影响患者术后并发症(如桡动脉闭塞、血肿、疼痛)和舒适度的核心变量。近年来,缩短加压时长的策略成为研究热点。本文旨在综述不同加压时长方案对桡动脉冠脉造影术后患者的止血效果、血管并发症(特别是桡动脉闭塞)、局部并发症及舒适度的影响,并对个体化加压策略的未来研究方向进行展望,以期为临床优化护理实践提供循证依据。
The transradial approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the mainstream technique, offering advantages such as early patient mobilization, reduced bleeding complications, and improved comfort. Effective hemostasis at the puncture site is critical in post-procedural care. Inflatable transradial compression devices (e.g., TR-Band) are widely used due to their controllable pressure and standardized operation. However, the duration of compression is a key factor influencing post-procedural complications (such as radial artery occlusion, hematoma, and pain) and patient comfort. In recent years, strategies to shorten compression duration have become a focus of research. This article reviews the effects of different compression duration protocols on hemostatic efficacy, vascular complications (particularly radial artery occlusion), local complications, and comfort in patients after transradial CAG. It also provides an outlook on future research directions for individualized compression strategies, aiming to offer evidence-based guidance for optimizing clinical nursing practice.
[1] 易金星 林文敏 经皮桡动脉穿刺介入术治疗老年冠心病临床研究[J].中国卫生标准管理, 2024, 24(4): 124-127
[2] 许艳玲,王连生,史冬梅.不同止血装置对经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗后患者压迫止血的安全性及舒适度的影响研究[J].医疗卫生装备.2025,46(1)
[3] 肖丹,郭婷,涂惠,等.桡动脉压迫期间血压波动对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者术侧手掌肿胀的影响[J].中华护理杂志.2022,57(1)
[4] 元小晶,顾赛男,李明凤,等.经桡动脉入路介入术后压迫器护理管理的最佳证据总结[J].当代护士.2025,32(17)
[5] 姬国华 吴琪 吴红斌等.冠状动脉介入术桡动脉穿刺点不同压迫止血方案效果的比较[J].中国基层医药,2022,1(5):28-32
[6] 王小勇.不同包扎方法对经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入术后创口安全性及舒适度的影响[J].心电与循环,2023, 6(4)13-16
[7] 李金娥.经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗术后桡动脉气囊压迫器不同压迫时间止血效果比较[J] 中国全科医学,2019,s1(3)111-113
[8] 解凤英,孙慧.经桡动脉介入术后气囊压迫器减压时间的护理效果分析[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志.2020,(52)
[9] 邵艳艳.止血器在桡动脉冠状动脉手术后的评价分析[J].饮食保健.2020,(26)
[10] 张丹.冠心病患者PCI术后自我感受负担及其相关影响因素分析[J].中国医学创新.2024,21(1).
[11] 王光友,刘昆鹏.经皮冠状动脉介入术中桡动脉急性损伤危险因素研究[J].浙江创伤外科.2024,29(4).
[12] 朴雪莲.桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗老年冠心病的效果分析[J].黑龙江医药.2023,36(4).
[13] 龙珊,刘兴德,李甜甜,等.冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后合并焦虑抑郁机制及治疗的研究进展[J].实用医学杂志.2023,39(21).