[email protected]

临床护理进展

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2026; 5: (6) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20260298 .

The application effect of comprehensive nursing based on the goal theory in patients with diabetes and critical diseases in the emergency intensive care unit
以目标理论为指导的全面护理在急诊重症监护室糖尿病合并危重疾病患者中的应用效果

作者: 吴凡 *, 郭乃华

上海市第七人民医院 上海

*通讯作者: 吴凡,单位:上海市第七人民医院 上海; ;

引用本文: 吴凡, 郭乃华 以目标理论为指导的全面护理在急诊重症监护室糖尿病合并危重疾病患者中的应用效果[J]. 临床护理进展, 2026; 5: (6) : 69-72.
Published: 2026/6/15 9:30:01

摘要

目的 将以目标理论为指导的全面护理用于急诊重症监护室(Emergency Intensive Care Unit, EICU)糖尿病(Diabetes Mellitus, DM)合并危重疾病患者中,对其应用效果进行分析。方法 回顾性选取2024年11月-2025年11月本院EICU收治的90例DM合并危重疾病患者临床资料进行分析,根据护理方案进行分组,对照组45例行常规ICU护理,观察组45例行以目标理论为指导的全面护理,对两组干预结果进行评价。结果 干预前,两组空腹血糖(Fasting Plasma Glucose, FPG)、餐后2h血糖(2-hour Post-load Blood Glucose, 2hPG)、糖化血红蛋白(Glycated Hemoglobin, HbA1c)水平比较,不具显著差异(P>0.05),干预后,两组各项血糖指标水平均较前明显降低,且组间两两对比,观察组各指标水平更低(P<0.05);干预前,两组急性生理或慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation ll, APACHE Ⅱ)、生活质量量表(Short-form 36-item Health Survey, SF-36)评分比较,不具显著差异(P>0.05),干预后,观察组APACHE Ⅱ评分更低、SF-36评更高(P<0.05);两组并发症发生率比较,观察组4.44%更低(P<0.05)。结论 对EICU收治的糖尿病合并危重疾病患者来说,应用以目标理论为指导的全面护理既能控制患者血糖水平,还可改善预后及生活质量,降低并发症发生风险,具有较高应用价值。

关键词: 糖尿病;急诊重症监护室;危重疾病;目标理论;全面护理

Abstract

Objective To apply comprehensive nursing based on the goal theory in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and critical illness in the emergency intensive care unit (EICU), and to analyze the application effect.
Methods The clinical data of 90 patients with DM and critical diseases who were admitted to the EICU of our hospital from November 2024 to November 2025 were retrospectively selected for analysis. The patients were grouped according to the nursing plan. The control group consisted of 45 patients who received routine ICU care, while the observation group consisted of 45 patients who received comprehensive care guided by the goal theory. The intervention results of the two groups were evaluated.
Results Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in FPG, 2hPG, and HbA1c levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the levels of all blood glucose indicators in both groups were significantly lower than before, and pairwise comparisons between the groups showed that the levels of each indicator in the observation group were lower (P < 0.05); Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in APACHE II score and SF-36 score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the APACHE II score of the observation group was lower and the SF-36 score was higher (P < 0.05); The incidence of complications between the two groups was compared, and the incidence of the observation group was 4.44% lower (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   For patients with DM and critical illness admitted to the EICU, applying comprehensive nursing guided by the goal theory can not only control the blood glucose levels of patients, but also improve prognosis and quality of life, reduce the risk of complications, and has high application value.

Key words: Diabetes; Emergency intensive care unit; Critical illness; Goal theory; Comprehensive nursing

参考文献 References

[1] 李洪平. 护理干预对胰岛素泵强化治疗糖尿病危重症患者的应用效果[J]. 糖尿病天地,2022,19(6):254-255.

[2] 苏广生,陈焕辉,黄少华. 肠内营养护理在合并糖尿病危重症患者中的应用效果分析[J]. 当代医药论丛,2022, 20(23):187-190. 

[3] 李思青,李好正. 目标设定理论下动态健康教育对脑梗死合并2型糖尿病患者医嘱依从性、血糖控制及认知功能的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药科学,2024,47(6):174-175,178. 

[4] 成晶晶,秦悌芳,王瑶君. 循证护理改善合并糖尿病的危重症患者血糖水平的价值探讨[J]. 糖尿病新世界,2025, 28(4):146-149. 

[5] 叶变良,陈丽云. 基于目标设定理论的低血糖生成指数膳食对2型糖尿病患者干预效果的观察[J]. 糖尿病天地,2021,18(2):133-134.

[6] 尉晓琳. 基于Omaha理论的阶段目标性干预在糖尿病合并脑卒中后遗症患者中的应用分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2022,51(1):107-111. 

[7] 刘佩佩,程浩然,许姣姣. 糖尿病危重症患者实施肠内营养护理的效果[J]. 智慧健康,2024,10(35):174-176. 

[8] 陈晓希,江焯桥,胡国华. 以目标理论为指导的全面护理在急诊重症监护室糖尿病合并危重疾病患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国民康医学,2024,36(21):166-168,172. 

[9] 阎成娟. 整体护理联合个体化营养支持对危重症合并糖尿病患者的护理效果[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2024,35(5): 777-779.

[10] 仲晨馨. 循证护理对合并糖尿病的危重症患者血糖水平及压疮的改善作用研究[J]. 医学食疗与健康,2021, 19(28):179-180.