Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2026; 5: (5) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20260262 .
总浏览量: 46
乌鲁木齐市友谊医院 新疆乌鲁木齐
*通讯作者: 王涛,单位:乌鲁木齐市友谊医院 新疆乌鲁木齐; ;
目的 探讨ICU脓毒症休克患者预后影响因素及针对性护理策略效果,为改善预后提供参考。方法选取2024年10月至2025年10月本院ICU 44例脓毒症休克患者,随机分为对照组和实验组各22例。对照组常规护理,实验组在此基础采用基于预后影响因素的针对性护理。收集资料分析预后相关因素,比较两组ICU住院时间、总住院时间、28d存活率及护理前后APACHEⅡ、SOFA评分。结果 多因素Logistic回归显示,年龄≥60岁、APACHEⅡ评分≥25分、MODS、感染未有效控制是预后独立危险因素(P<0.05)。实验组ICU住院时间(8.2±2.1)d、总住院时间(16.5±3.2)d,均短于对照组;28d存活率81.82%,高于对照组;护理后APACHEⅡ评分为(12.3±2.5)分、SOFA评分(5.1±1.3)分,均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 年龄≥60岁、APACHEⅡ评分≥25分、MODS及感染未有效控制是主要危险因素;针对性护理能缩短住院时间,降低器官衰竭风险,提高28d存活率,改善预后。
Objective This study investigates the prognostic factors and targeted nursing strategies for septic shock patients in the ICU, aiming to provide references for improving prognosis. Methods A total of 44 septic shock patients admitted to the ICU of our hospital from October 2024 to October 2025 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, with 22 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing care, while the experimental group received targeted nursing based on prognostic factors. Data were collected and analyzed to evaluate prognostic-related factors, including ICU stay duration, total hospitalization duration, 28-day survival rate, and APACHE II and SOFA scores before and after nursing. Results Multivariate logistic regression showed that age ≥60 years, APACHE II score ≥25, MODS, and uncontrolled infection were independent risk factors for poor prognosis (P<0.05). The ICU stay duration (8.2±2.1) days and total hospitalization duration (16.5±3.2) days in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group. The 28-day survival rate was 81.82%, higher than that in the control group. The APACHE II score (12.3±2.5) and SOFA score (5.1±1.3) after nursing were lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Age ≥60 years, APACHE II score ≥25, MODS, and uncontrolled infection are major risk factors. Targeted nursing can shorten hospitalization duration, reduce the risk of organ failure, improve 28-day survival rate, and enhance prognosis.
[1] 彭赞霖.肠道菌群介导病原体源性抗体对脓毒症的影响:一项中介孟德尔随机化研究[D].南方医科大学,2025.
[2] 覃蝶.创伤失血性休克患者并发脓毒症危险因素分析及预后评估[D].广州医科大学,2025.
[3] 施麦青,嵇富海,王扬,等. ICU脓毒症休克患者发展为慢性危重症的危险因素分析[J].重庆医学,2025,54(05): 1143-1146+1150.
[4] 罗芳,吴金海,李君,等. 阶段性症状管理对脓毒症休克ICU患者的效果评价[J].护理实践与研究,2025,22(02): 270-276.
[5] 龚建,焦宪法. 重症监护室脓毒症休克患者进行山莨菪碱治疗的临床观察[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2024,34(24): 120-123.
[6] 曾江维.基于MIMIC-Ⅳ数据库的老年脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤患者危险因素及其预测模型[D].华北理工大学,2024.
[7] 陈若男.PICU脓毒症休克儿童能量和蛋白摄入与临床结局的相关性研究[D].重庆医科大学,2024.
[8] 汪海祥,王扬,陈军,等. 重症监护病房中获得性高钠血症的危险因素及其对脓毒症休克患者预后的影响[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2023,22(08):566-571.