[email protected]

当代护理

Contemporary Nursing

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Contemporary Nursing. 2026; 7: (6) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20260318 .

The impact of a core-multi-team approach to hospice care on the death attitude and cancer pain severity of elderly patients with advanced cancer
一核多元团队式安宁疗护对老年晚期癌症患者死亡态度及癌痛程度的影响

作者: 董钰 *

遵义医科大学第二附属医院 贵州遵义

*通讯作者: 董钰,单位:遵义医科大学第二附属医院 贵州遵义; ;

引用本文: 董钰 一核多元团队式安宁疗护对老年晚期癌症患者死亡态度及癌痛程度的影响[J]. 当代护理, 2026; 7: (6) : 99-101.
Published: 2026/6/5 10:20:19

摘要

目的 分析一核多元团队式安宁疗护对老年晚期癌症患者死亡态度及癌痛程度的影响。方法 选取2024年1月-2026年1月我院收治的200例老年晚期癌症患者,按照不同护理方式分为两组,每组均为100例,对比常规护理(对照组)与一核多元团队式安宁疗护(观察组)的临床效果。结果 观察组死亡自然接受度高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组VAS、PSQI评分以及癌因性疲乏各项评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 老年晚期癌症患者开展一核多元团队式安宁疗护,可以纠正患者死亡态度,减轻疼痛程度和癌因性疲乏,提升睡眠质量。

关键词: 一核多元团队;安宁疗护;晚期癌症;死亡态度;癌痛程度

Abstract

Objective To analyze the impact of a core-multiple team approach to hospice care on the death attitude and cancer pain severity of elderly patients with advanced cancer.
Methods 200 elderly patients with advanced cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2024 to January 2026 were selected and divided into two groups according to different nursing methods, with 100 cases in each group. The clinical effects of conventional care (control group) and the core-multiple team approach to hospice care (observation group) were compared.
Results The natural acceptance of death in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05); the VAS, PSQI scores, and scores of various aspects of cancer-related fatigue in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   For elderly patients with advanced cancer, implementing a core-multiple team approach to hospice care can correct the death attitude, alleviate pain and cancer-related fatigue, and improve sleep quality.

Key words: Core-multi-team approach; Hospice care; Advanced cancer; Death attitude; Cancer pain severity

参考文献 References

[1] 陈晶梅,黄丽莉,魏小玲. 基于安宁疗护理念的病房构建对民营医疗机构安宁疗护水平及患者满意度的影响研究 [J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2025, 32 (11): 75-80. 

[2] 黄鑫,张香梅. 肿瘤晚期患者安宁疗护模式接受度的影响因素分析 [J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2025, 10 (33): 149-152. 

[3] 杜晓霞,孙媛媛,鲁德玕,等. “一核多元”安宁疗护模式对肺癌晚期患者癌因性疲乏、希望水平及抑郁情绪的影响 [J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23 (02): 335-339. 

[4] 崔嘉敏,夏卿,孙晶,等. 安宁疗护对晚期肝癌患者癌痛控制效果及生活质量的影响 [J]. 当代医药论丛, 2025, 23 (02): 5-7.

[5] 潘素虹,徐结芳,文莉. 全程全人服务理念下多维照护策略在晚期肿瘤患者安宁疗护中的应用 [J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2024, 30 (21): 35-38.

[6] 陈娟,钱玉霞. 自我表露干预联合安宁疗护对晚期肺癌患者癌因性疲乏及生活质量的影响 [J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42 (18): 112-116.

[7] 周玲,张郁秋. 正念减压训练联合安宁疗护对肺癌脑转移患者癌痛程度、自我感受负担及尊严感的影响 [J]. 黑龙江医学, 2024, 48 (17): 2152-2155.

[8] 张鑫,刘玲,刘为. 基于二元应对理论的安宁疗护健康教育对胰腺癌终末期患者及家属死亡态度的影响 [J]. 中国药物经济学, 2024, 19 (S1): 163-165.

[9] 王露,李小娜. “一核多元”团队照顾下的安宁疗护对晚期肺癌患者癌因性疲乏心理韧性和应对方式的影响 [J]. 山西医药杂志, 2024, 53 (11): 869-873.

[10] 魏彧潼. “一核多元”安宁疗护干预策略在肺癌晚期患者中的应用观察 [J]. 承德医学院学报, 2022, 39 (05): 407-410.