Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2026; 5: (4) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20260184 .
总浏览量: 129
广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 广西南宁
*通讯作者: 苏玉兰,单位:广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 广西南宁; ;
目的 探究以家庭为中心赋权模式对提升乳腺癌术后患者出院准备度及社会功能的应用效果。方法选取2025年7月-2026年4月在本院乳腺外科收治的140例乳腺癌术后病患,采用随机数字表法分为两组。对照组实施围术期常规护理及出院指导,干预组在对照组基础上实施以家庭为中心赋权模式干预。比较两组出院准备度评分及社会影响。结果 干预前,两组患者出院准备度各维度评分比较(P>0.05);干预后,干预组生理状况、疾病知识、出院后应对能力、社会支持各维度评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);干预前,两组SIS评分、PSS-Fa量表各维度及总分比较(P>0.05);干预后,干预组SIS评分低于对照组,PSS-Fa量表总分及情感支持、物质支持、信息支持、陪伴支持各维度评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 以家庭为中心赋权模式可有效提升乳腺癌术后患者的出院准备度,减轻疾病带来的社会影响,具有较高的临床推广价值。
Objective To explore the application effect of family centered empowerment model on improving the discharge readiness and social function of patients with breast cancer after surgery. Methods 140 postoperative patients with breast cancer who were admitted to our hospital from July 2025 to April 2026 were selected and divided into two groups by random number table. The control group received routine perioperative care and discharge guidance, while the intervention group received a family centered empowerment model intervention on the basis of the control group. Compare the discharge readiness scores and social impact between two groups. Results Before intervention, the scores of discharge readiness in each dimension were compared between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); After intervention, the intervention group had higher scores in physiological status, disease knowledge, coping ability after discharge, and social support dimensions than the control group (P<0.05); Before intervention, the SIS scores, PSS Fa scale dimensions, and total scores were compared between the two groups (P>0.05); After intervention, the SIS score of the intervention group was lower than that of the control group, and the total score of the PSS Fa scale and the scores of emotional support, material support, information support, and companionship support dimensions were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The family centered empowerment model can effectively improve the discharge readiness of breast cancer patients after surgery, reduce the social impact of the disease, and has high clinical value.
[1] 李闪闪,曹永丽,聂宝华,等.基于过程性评价的健康宣教模式对乳腺癌患者根治术后负面情绪及治疗依从性的影响[J].黑龙江医药科学,2026,49(01):100-102.
[2] 汤蓓.基于LEARNS模式的营养健康教育对乳腺癌术后放疗患者营养状况的影响[J].妇儿健康导刊,2025,4(24): 76-79.
[3] 陈善玉,李红.SMT指导下的护理支持干预模式对乳腺癌术后化疗患者生存质量的影响[J].中国医学创新,2025,22(30):67-71.
[4] 陈穆媛,张宁宁.引导式健康教育对乳腺癌术后患者生活质量癌因性疲乏及营养状态的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2025,40(24):4622-4626.
[5] 徐伟民,贾文俊,陈啸,等.运动预康复对乳腺癌手术患者术后恢复的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志,2025,53(12): 1549-1552.
[6] 吴帅,赵蓓蓓.基于行为转变理论的积极心理干预对乳腺癌术后患者癌因性疲乏和心理韧性的影响[J].航空航天医学杂志,2025,36(12):1520-1523.
[7] 陈秋萍.正念减压训练联合心理护理对乳腺癌术后化疗患者不良情绪及生活质量的影响[J].吉林医学,2025,46(10):2552-2555.
[8] 夏庆庆.细节行为护理在乳腺癌术后上肢水肿患者中的应用效果[J].中国民康医学,2025,37(22):194-196.
[9] 张颍歌,杜玉英,王柯,等.基于接纳与承诺疗法的康复教育对乳腺癌改良根治术后早期乳腺癌患者心理弹性和创伤后生长水平的影响[J].河南外科学杂志,2025,31(06): 76-78.
[10] 杜倩.个体化心理护理对乳腺癌术后患者心理状态、人格特征及生活质量的影响[J].婚育与健康,2025,31(21): 175-177.