[email protected]

当代护理

Contemporary Nursing

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Contemporary Nursing. 2026; 7: (4) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20260176 .

A study on the stress management and psychological experience of family members of children with febrile convulsions
高热惊厥患儿家属应激处理及心理体验的现况调查研究

作者: 谢婕 *

华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院 湖北武汉

*通讯作者: 谢婕,单位:华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院 湖北武汉;

引用本文: 谢婕 高热惊厥患儿家属应激处理及心理体验的现况调查研究[J]. 当代护理, 2026; 7: (4) : 13-15.
Published: 2026/4/1 10:00:32

摘要

目的 调查高热惊厥患儿家属应激处理及心理体验,探究实施针对性干预措施的临床价值。方法 选取本院收治92例高热惊厥患儿家属为对象,时段2024年5月-2025年7月。使用家属应激量表(RSS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)对全部患儿家属开展调查评估,分析其应激状态和心理体验情况。根据评估情况采取针对性干预,对比干预前后RSS、SAS、SDS评分变化情况。结果 全部患儿家属干预前RSS、SAS、SDS评分均处于较高水平。实施针对干预后,家属RSS、SAS、SDS评分与干预前比较均明显下降,组间有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论 高热惊厥患儿家属伴随明显应激反应和焦虑、抑郁情绪,通过实施针对性干预可减轻其应激反应,缓解负性情绪。

关键词: 高热惊厥;家属;应激;心理体验

Abstract

Objective To investigate the stress management and psychological experience of family members of children with febrile seizures, and explore the clinical value of implementing targeted intervention measures.
Methods 92 family members of children with febrile seizures admitted to our hospital were selected as the subjects, from May 2024 to July 2025. Conduct a survey and evaluation of all family members of the affected children using the Family Stress Scale (RSS), Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and analyze their stress status and psychological experience. Adopt targeted interventions based on the evaluation results, and compare the changes in RSS, SAS, and SDS scores before and after the intervention.
Results The RSS, SAS, and SDS scores of all family members of the affected children were at a high level before intervention. After implementing targeted interventions, the RSS, SAS, and SDS scores of family members significantly decreased compared to before the intervention, with statistical differences between groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Family members of children with febrile seizures are accompanied by significant stress reactions, anxiety, and depression. Targeted interventions can alleviate their stress reactions and negative emotions.

Key words: Febrile convulsion; Family members; Stress; Psychological experience

参考文献 References

[1] 卢小红. 全程绿色通道护理模式对小儿高热惊厥救治效果及家属满意度的影响[J]. 基层医学论坛,2022, 26(29):121-123. 

[2] 李娅,柳轮,卢群叶. 预警机制下的护理策略对高热惊厥患儿病情控制及恢复效果的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(31):144-147.

[3] 张忠丽. 高热惊厥患儿家属应对方式调查及其影响因素分析[J]. 妇儿健康导刊,2025,4(15):180-183,188. 

[4] 王霞云,孙凤平,李冰. PDCA护理干预模式下的家属互补式健康教育在高热惊厥患儿中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2024,30(19):38-41. 

[5] 欧丁岭,吴佳芳,陈利. 以预警评分为导向的针对性干预对高热惊厥患儿症状缓解时间及家属心理状况的影响[J]. 当代护士,2024,31(34):97-99. 

[6] 党晓,尹莉娜,张小宁,等. 阶段性健康教育对高热惊厥患儿康复及家属心理的影响[J]. 山西卫生健康职业学院学报,2023,33(5):77-79. 

[7] 卢欢. 家属参与照顾的护理模式在上呼吸道感染合并高热惊厥患儿中的应用研究[J]. 当代护士,2022,29(6): 102-105. 

[8] 王芳,王琳,陈敏. 探讨智能急救路程优化对急诊高热惊厥患儿抢救效果、家属满意度的影响[J]. 首都食品与医药,2023,30(6):109-112. 

[9] 吴凤, 梁静仪, 吴爵慧, 等. 分阶段健康教育对高热惊厥患儿家属疾病认知及治疗依从性的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理,2022,8(2):181-183. 

[10] 葛丹萍,斯琼. 阶段性健康教育对高热惊厥患儿家属疾病知识掌握度心理状态评分及患儿再复发的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2022,37(22):4277-4280.