Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2026; 5: (3) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20260126 .
总浏览量: 117
宁夏医科大学总医院 宁夏银川
*通讯作者: 王蓉,单位:宁夏医科大学总医院 宁夏银川;
目的 剖析人文关怀护理用于胸外科恶性肿瘤的作用。方法 随机均分2024年11月-2025年10月本院胸外科接诊的恶性肿瘤病人(N=76)。试验组采取人文关怀护理,对照组行常规护理。对比HAMA评分等指标。结果 关于护理质量各维度评分:试验组安全管理(96.28±2.03)分、基础护理(97.92±1.68)分、服务态度(96.86±2.14)分;对照组安全管理(89.05±3.19)分、基础护理(90.82±2.73)分、服务态度(90.11±3.07)分,差异显著(P<0.05)。满意度:试验组97.37%,对照组78.95%,差异显著(P<0.05)。HAMD和HAMA评分:干预后:试验组(11.72±2.67)分、(10.05±2.19)分,对照组(15.39±3.41)分、(14.99±3.08)分,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 对胸外科恶性肿瘤病人应用人文关怀护理,不仅能取得显著效果,还有利于病人满意度的提高及心态的改善。
Objective To analyze the role of humanistic care nursing in thoracic surgery for malignant tumors. Methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups with malignant tumors admitted to the thoracic surgery department of our hospital from November 2024 to October 2025 (N=76). The experimental group received humanistic care nursing, while the control group received routine nursing. Compare indicators such as the HAMA score. Results The scores of each dimension of nursing quality: The scores of safety management in the experimental group were (96.28±2.03), basic nursing (97.92±1.68), and service attitude (96.86±2.14). In the control group, the scores of safety management were (89.05±3.19), basic nursing (90.82±2.73), and service attitude (90.11±3.07). The difference was significant (P < 0.05). Satisfaction rate: 97.37% in the experimental group and 78.95% in the control group, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). HAMD and HAMA scores: After intervention: The experimental group had (11.72±2.67) points and (10.05±2.19) points, while the control group had (15.39±3.41) points and (14.99±3.08) points, with significant differences (P < 0.05). Conclusion Humanistic care nursing for patients with malignant tumors in thoracic surgery can not only achieve remarkable results, but also facilitate the improvement of patients' satisfaction and mentality.
[1] 金雪,刘毅. 人文关怀护理对胸外科恶性肿瘤患者干预效果分析[J]. 现代养生(上半月版),2022,22(4):540-542.
[2] 高阿娟,刘乔,陈奕清,等. 优质护理联合人文关怀对晚期恶性肿瘤患者情绪、睡眠及生活质量的影响[J]. 国际精神病学杂志,2024,51(4):1315-1318.
[3] Larisa Padilo, Onega Ulianova, Galina Maslyakova, et al. Can the infection, caused by Chlamydia psittaci, produce the stimulation of the growth of a malignant tumor: studying by using of t-LASCA technique on animal model[C]//Saratov fall meeting 2023:SPIE,, 2023,15(27): 114570I-1-114570I-9.
[4] 孙晓燕. 姑息护理联合人文关怀对晚期恶性肿瘤患者心理状态及癌性疼痛的影响[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2024,35(3):356-359.
[5] Umakanth Koyyala, Usharani Thirunavukkarasu. Classification of Benign and Malignant Tumor Cells Using Bagging and Adaboost Classifiers from Wisconsin Dataset for the Potential Diagnostic Application[C]//Advance computing and ingenious technology in engineering science: Greater Noida, India, 30-31 December 2021. 2024,13(31):020005-1-020005-6.
[6] 李晋平,王艳,韦俭俭,等. 恶性肿瘤患者护理人文关怀的满意度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复,2024,31(6):375-382.
[7] 张志敏. 人文关怀护理干预对胸外科恶性肿瘤患者负性情绪及生存质量的影响[J]. 实用中西医结合临床,2018,18(2):166-167.
[8] 任婷,丁芳艳,沈荀艳,等. Watson人文关怀护理联合德尔菲法同伴支持对宫颈癌手术患者的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2025,44(3):501-505.