[email protected]

现代护理医学杂志

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2026; 5: (2) ; 10.12208/j.jmnm.20260114 .

Discussion on the risk assessment of postoperative bleeding and targeted nursing measures after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
消化内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)术后出血风险评估与针对性护理措施探讨

作者: 朱丽丽 *

乌鲁木齐市中医医院 新疆乌鲁木齐

*通讯作者: 朱丽丽,单位:乌鲁木齐市中医医院 新疆乌鲁木齐;

引用本文: 朱丽丽 消化内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)术后出血风险评估与针对性护理措施探讨[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2026; 5: (2) : 184-187.
Published: 2026/2/28 9:35:38

摘要

目的 探讨消化内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)术后出血的风险因素,分析针对性护理措施的效果。方法 选取2024年1月至2025年6月在接受EMR治疗的患者120例,随机分为对照组(常规护理)与观察组(在风险评估基础上实施针对性护理)各60例,对比干预效果。结果 观察组术后出血发生率(3.33%)低于对照组(15.00%),止血时间短于对照组,生活质量评分、护理满意度评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 基于风险评估的针对性护理可降低EMR术后出血风险,全面提升患者生活质量与护理满意度各维度水平,效果良好。

关键词: 消化内镜下黏膜切除术;术后出血;风险评估;针对性护理;生活质量;护理满意度维度评分

Abstract

Objective To explore the risk factors of postoperative bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and analyze the effect of targeted nursing measures.
Methods A total of 120 patients who received EMR treatment from January 2024 to June 2025 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (with conventional care) and an observation group (with targeted care based on risk assessment), with 60 cases in each group. The intervention effects were compared.
Results The incidence of postoperative bleeding in the observation group (3.33%) was lower than that in the control group (15.00%), the hemostasis time was shorter than that in the control group, and the quality of life score and nursing satisfaction score were both higher than those in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Targeted nursing based on risk assessment can reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding after EMR, comprehensively improve the quality of life and nursing satisfaction of patients in all dimensions, and the effect is good.

Key words: Mucosal resection under digestive endoscopy; Postoperative bleeding; Risk assessment; Targeted care; Quality of life; Nursing satisfaction dimension score

参考文献 References

[1] 邹雨恒,凌新,罗茜. 构建消化道肿瘤患者内镜下黏膜切除术后出血的预测模型及护理对策[J]. 首都食品与医药,2025,32(17):134-139. 

[2] 李雪客,李敏华,王文远. ESD术治疗早期胃癌患者联合针对性护理干预对术后出血率、炎症因子的影响[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2022,7(35):11-14.

[3] 陈姝.综合护理措施对高血压脑出血患者实施手术的护理效果分析[J].中文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)医药卫生,2025(8):074-077.

[4] 沈洁,胡玉娜,夏黎明,邹辉煌.探究Caprini血栓风险评估下分级护理在重症脑出血术后患者的应用效果[J].黑龙江医药科学,2025,48(1):184-186190.

[5] 杨颖琳,张焱,张莉莉,陈建红,潘琼,许骁玮.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者脑出血行抢救性化学治疗联合开颅手术的护理[J].护理与康复,2025,24(4):78-80.

[6] 赵婧,马帅,杜娟,刘婷婷.中青年高血压脑出血患者术后康复运动依从性发展轨迹的纵向研究及护理启发[J].河南医学研究,2025,34(17):3226-3232.

[7] 邵金洁,杜超群,杨晓英,方文超.高血压脑出血术后肠内营养病人发生误吸的影响因素及风险预测模型的构建[J].循证护理,2025,11(15):3172-3175.

[8] 程静,李菁,崔学颍,赵美红.渐进性康复护理对老年高血压脑出血术后恢复期患者的影响研究[J].浙江创伤外科,2025,30(5):991-993.

[9] 隋健飞,袁巧玲,王硕.老年动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者介入栓塞术后感染的危险因素分析及护理对策构建[J].中国医刊,2025,60(6):666-670.

[10] 潘琼,杨琴,刘倩.基于Caprini血栓风险评估量表的分级护理在重症脑出血术后昏迷患者中的应用效果[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2024,10(11):172-174.

[11] 李旭琴,黄昉芳,俞超.致命性肺血栓栓塞症患者高出血风险下行体外膜肺氧合的护理[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2025,6(4):462-465.

[12] 仲秀青,王玉琴,张蕾.前馈控制理念模式下风险预警护理对行改良Sauve-Kapandji术患者的应用效果观察[J].青海医药杂志,2025,55(7):35-38.