[email protected]

国际护理学研究

International Journal of Nursing Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2026; 8: (2) ; 10.12208/j.ijnr.20260091 .

Construction of the whole process intervention program of seizure-free electroconvulsive therapy guided by evidence-based nursing and its clinical effect
循证护理导向的无抽搐电休克治疗全流程干预方案构建及临床效果研究

作者: 吕彦康 *, 王娟, 李蓉

宁夏回族自治区宁安医院 宁夏银川

*通讯作者: 吕彦康,单位:宁夏回族自治区宁安医院 宁夏银川;

引用本文: 吕彦康, 王娟, 李蓉 循证护理导向的无抽搐电休克治疗全流程干预方案构建及临床效果研究[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2026; 8: (2) : 136-139.
Published: 2026/2/9 9:00:20

摘要

目的 探讨对于无抽搐电休克治疗患者采取循证护理导向的全流程干预方案的效果。方法 选取于2025年1月-2025年12月本院就诊的80例接受无抽搐电休克治疗的精神疾病患者,随机分为对照组40例、观察组40例,分别予以常规护理、循证护理导向的全流程干预方案,分析对比2组治疗依从性、精神状况。结果 观察组治疗依从性更高(P<0.05)。观察组干预后的现状精神病症状检查、简明精神病量表评分值均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对于无抽搐电休克治疗患者采取循证护理导向的全流程干预方案,可助于提高治疗依从性,改善精神状况。

关键词: 无抽搐电休克治疗;循证护理导向;全流程干预;护理效果

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of an evidence-based nursing-oriented comprehensive intervention protocol for patients undergoing non-seizure electroconvulsive therapy (N-EST).
Methods A total of 80 psychiatric patients treated with N-EST at our hospital from January 2025 to December 2025 were randomly divided into a control group (n=40) and an observation group (n=40). The control group received conventional nursing care, while the observation group received the evidence-based nursing-oriented comprehensive intervention protocol. Treatment adherence and psychiatric status were compared between the two groups.
Results The observation group demonstrated higher treatment adherence (P<0.05). Post-intervention, the scores of the Current Psychiatric Symptom Checklist (CPS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Implementing an evidence-based nursing-oriented comprehensive intervention protocol for N-EST patients can enhance treatment adherence and improve psychiatric status.

Key words: TBSA; Evidence-based nursing guidance; Whole-process intervention; Nursing outcomes

参考文献 References

[1] 胡秋月,曹小燕,袁华.沟通技巧及心理护理对无抽搐电休克治疗精神病患者的疗效观察[J].心理月刊,2022(11): 123-125.

[2] 李玉,孙建中,袁桂敏.护理风险管控强化模式在精神分裂症患者无抽搐电休克治疗中的应用效果[J].中华现代护理杂志,2022,28(20):2770-2773.

[3] 麦剑欣,陈婉华.综合护理在无抽搐电休克治疗精神疾病患者中的效果分析[J].医药前沿,2022,12(5):85-87.

[4] 徐永青,刘玲.集束化护理方案对无抽搐电休克治疗后谵妄的影响[J].四川精神卫生,2021,34(3):243-246.

[5] 姚玉.以目的为导向的标准流程干预在无抽搐电休克治疗精神障碍患者中的应用[J].中国当代医药,2022,29(19): 169-171189.

[6] 潘建发,黄春梅. 无抽搐电休克联合互动达标理论护理对狂躁症患者睡眠质量的影响[J].世界睡眠医学杂志, 2024,11(10):2324-2326.

[7] 翁客华,陈少苗,张伟枝,等. 个性化护理干预对无抽搐电休克患者心理状态的影响[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2024, 29(05):584-586.

[8] 盖曙娟,王少峰,柳志英,等. 心理护理干预联合无抽搐电休克治疗对难治性抑郁症患者的疗效[J].心理月刊,2024, 19(04):135-137.