Analysis of the nursing value of fully implantable venous port systems and PICC in oncology care
完全性植入静脉输液港与PICC在肿瘤科护理中的护理价值分析

摘要

目的 评价全静脉置管（TIVAP）和外周静脉（PICC）在肿瘤内科手术中的应用价值，并对两种方法的疗效和安全性进行比较。方法：选择2024年6月-2025年4月住院的癌症病人86例，随机分成TIVAP组43名，PICC组43名，比较两组插管成功率，术后并发症，留置时间，护理满意度，生活质量。结果 观察组置管成功率为97.67%，高于对照组的93.02%，但差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。观察组并发症发生率（6.98%）显著低于对照组（20.93%）（P<0.05）。观察组导管留置时间更长（P<0.05），护理满意度及生活质量评分均优于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 TIVAP技术应用于肿瘤内科手术，安全性高，并发症少，留置时间长，对病人的满意度高，生活质量好，是一种值得推广的方法。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the application value of total intravenous access port (TIVAP) and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in oncology surgery and compare the efficacy and safety of the two methods.
Methods A total of 86 cancer patients hospitalized from June 2024 to April 2025 were randomly divided into a TIVAP group (43 cases) and a PICC group (43 cases). The catheterization success rate, postoperative complications, dwell time, nursing satisfaction, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.
Results The catheterization success rate in the observation group was 97.67%, which was higher than that in the control group (93.02%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The complication rate in the observation group (6.98%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.93%) (P<0.05). The observation group had a longer catheter dwell time (P<0.05), and both nursing satisfaction and quality of life scores were superior to those of the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   TIVAP technology is safe, has fewer complications, longer dwell time, high patient satisfaction, and improved quality of life when applied in oncology surgery, making it a method worthy of promotion.