International Journal of Nursing Research
International Journal of Nursing Research. 2025; 7: (12) ; 10.12208/j.ijnr.20250629 .
总浏览量: 83
空军军医大学第二附属医院骨科 陕西西安
*通讯作者： 代选慧,单位：空军军医大学第二附属医院骨科 陕西西安；
目的 探讨老年综合评估的个体化护理对改善老年骨质疏松患者生活质量的影响。方法 本次研究报告的对照样本均选自2024年1月-2025年1月期间在本院进行治疗的老年骨质疏松症患者，通过不同的护理方式明确优势的护理方案，对照组采用常规护理模式，观察组采用个体化护理，且共计选择对照样本68例，每个小组包含34例患者，以此比较各组指标。结果 比较两组患者骨密度变化情况，发现护理前两组之间并无显著的差异，不具有统计学意义（P＞0.05）；护理后，能够显著发现两组间观察组的骨密度提升较为显著，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；可以发现在护理后观察组的骨代谢指标更具优势，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；通过两组对比数据发现观察组的各项指标分数更高，且证实其护理方式能够提升患者生活质量，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 采用个体化护理能够有效改善老年骨质疏松患者的症状，且提升患者生活质量，值得推广。
Objective To investigate the impact of individualized nursing in comprehensive geriatric assessment on improving the quality of life of elderly osteoporosis patients. Methods The control group and observation group were selected from elderly osteoporosis patients treated at our hospital between January 2024 and January 2025. Different nursing approaches were implemented to identify the superior care model. The control group received standard nursing care, while the observation group received individualized nursing. A total of 68 patients were selected, with 34 cases in each group, to compare various indicators. Results When comparing bone density changes between two patient groups, no significant difference was observed between the groups before nursing intervention (P>0.05), which lacked statistical significance. After nursing care, a significant improvement in bone density was noted in the observation group (P<0.05), demonstrating statistically significant differences. The observation group also showed superior bone metabolism indicators post-nursing (P<0.05), with statistically significant differences. Comparative data revealed higher scores across all indicators in the observation group, confirming that the nursing approach effectively improves patients' quality of life (P<0.05). Conclusion Individualized nursing effectively alleviates symptoms and enhances quality of life in elderly osteoporosis patients, making it a clinically recommended practice.
[1] 苏凤龙.5A护理联合健康教育干预糖尿病性骨质疏松的效果[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2025,42(05):589-590.
[2] 李佳玉,李香,崔立敏.“个性化+延续式”护理模式对老年骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者康复效果的影响[J].延边大学学报(自然科学版),2025,51(03):165-168.
[3] 谢地香,林旭霞,邹贵娇.渐进性康复护理对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者术后恢复的影响[J].基层医学论坛, 2025, 29(26):137-140.
[4] 李珊珊.健康教育在老年骨质疏松性髋部骨折护理中的应用[J].中国城乡企业卫生,2025,40(09):236-238.
[5] 高朋娟.综合护理在经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折术后的应用效果分析[J].青海医药杂志, 2025, 55(08):29-34.
[6] 陈云仙.骨质疏松患者如何做好护理[J].科学新生活, 2025, 28(08):60-61.
[7] 刘润雯.多模式健康赋权干预结合序贯式疼痛护理对腰椎骨质疏松性骨折患者的影响[J].当代医药论丛,2025, 23(21): 179-181.
[8] 雷瑞玉,李文菁,杨小梅.老年综合评估护理对老年骨质疏松患者生活质量的影响分析[J].当代护士(上旬刊), 2020, 27(09):114-116.