Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2025; 4: (11) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20250577 .
总浏览量: 57
昆山市第一人民医院 江苏苏州
*通讯作者: 金莉莉,单位:昆山市第一人民医院 江苏苏州;
目的 探讨天玑骨科机器人辅助治疗股骨颈空心钉内固定围术期护理的应用效果。方法 选取60例2024年1月至2025年1月于我院接受治疗的股骨颈骨折患者,按随机数字表法,以每组30例进行均分,分别纳入分为观察组与对照组。常规围术期护理在对照组开展,基于天玑骨科机器人辅助治疗的围术期护理方案在观察组开展。两组区别护理效果总结,对比两组手术相关指标、并发症发生率、患者满意度及康复效果。结果 手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数各项手术指标,观察组(70.5±10.2)min、(50.3±15.6)ml、(10.5±3.2)次均少于对照组(95.8±15.6)min、(85.6±20.3)ml、(18.6±4.5)次;观察组3(10.0%)并发症发生率更低于对照组8(26.7%);患者满意度观察组29(96.7%)高于对照组24(80.0%);Harris髋关节功能评分术后3个月及术后6个月观察组(75.6±8.5)、(85.2±7.8)更高于对照组(65.3±9.2)、(75.8±8.4);两组统计数据体现明显差异性(P<0.05)。结论 基于天玑骨科机器人辅助治疗的围术期护理可优化手术进程,降低并发症风险,提升患者满意度与康复效果,值得临床推广。
Objective To explore the application effect of Tianji Orthopedic robot-assisted perioperative nursing for femoral neck cannulated screw internal fixation. Methods Sixty patients with femoral neck fractures who were treated in our hospital from January 2024 to January 2025 were selected. According to the random number table method, 30 cases in each group were evenly divided and included in the observation group and the control group respectively. Conventional perioperative care was carried out in the control group, while the perioperative care plan based on the Tianji orthopedic robot-assisted treatment was implemented in the observation group. Summary of the nursing effects of the two groups, comparing the surgery-related indicators, incidence of complications, patient satisfaction and rehabilitation effects of the two groups. Results The surgical indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy in the observation group (70.5±10.2) min, (50.3±15.6) ml, and (10.5±3.2) times were all less than those in the control group (95.8±15.6) min, (85.6±20.3) ml, and (18.6±4.5) times. The incidence of complications in observation group 3 (10.0%) was lower than that in control group 8 (26.7%). The patient satisfaction rate in the observation group was 29 (96.7%), which was higher than that in the control group 24 (80.0%). The Harris hip function scores of the observation group at 3 months and 6 months after the operation (75.6±8.5) and (85.2±7.8) were higher than those of the control group (65.3±9.2) and (75.8±8.4). The two groups of statistical data showed significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Perioperative nursing based on Tianji orthopedic robot-assisted therapy can optimize the surgical process, reduce the risk of complications, improve patient satisfaction and rehabilitation effects, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
[1] 林振元,聂柳青,郑创欣,等.天玑骨科机器人辅助空心加压螺钉内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折患者的效果分析[J].中国伤残医学,2024,32(20):13-17.
[2] 贺喜顺,牛俊克,王鹏儒,等.天玑骨科手术机器人辅助导航空心钉内固定治疗儿童Delbet Ⅱ、Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(12):1267-1269.
[3] 聂德新,孙文皋,王小强,等. 天玑机器人辅助下置钉与传统空心螺钉内固定股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J]. 中国骨伤, 2023, 36(3):221-225.
[4] 廖永成,张明,徐俊华,等. 骨科手术机器人精准导航辅助空心螺钉内固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的疗效分析[J]. 骨科,2023,14(5):428-433.
[5] 杨光,左楠,祁宝昌,等. 骨科手术机器人辅助经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报,2024,45(5):783-787.
[6] 赵兴龙,申建军,冯康虎,等.骨科机器人辅助下F钉技术与倒三角平行钉治疗不稳定型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2024,37(2):129-134.
[7] 程芳令,张海存,吴沧陆,等. 骨科机器人辅助下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入准确性与安全性的临床研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科,2025,30(3):438-441.
[8] 许文,赵杰,马胜忠,等. 机器人辅助椎弓根置钉在颈椎手术治疗中的安全性及精准性观察[J]. 山东医药,2024, 64(29): 66-69.
[9] 徐俊华,王子健,张奕,等. 天玑骨科机器人辅助与传统切开复位内固定治疗跟骨骨折的临床对比研究[J]. 重庆医学,2024,53(6):850-854,860.
[10] 张子阳. 天玑骨科手术机器人辅助导航与传统股骨颈骨折中空钉内固定的疗效比较[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2023, 36(20):3492-3494.