[email protected]

临床护理进展

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2025; 4: (11) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20250572 .

Research record on targeted nursing of infection risk assessment stratification in acute leukemia chemotherapy patients
感染风险评估分层的针对性护理在急性白血病化疗患者中的研究记录

作者: 庄海娟, 孙利利 *

中日友好医院 北京

*通讯作者: 孙利利,单位:中日友好医院 北京;

引用本文: 庄海娟, 孙利利 感染风险评估分层的针对性护理在急性白血病化疗患者中的研究记录[J]. 临床护理进展, 2025; 4: (11) : 72-75.
Published: 2025/11/28 12:10:42

摘要

目的 探索此次创新护理干预在本文选择的研究对象中产生的效果。方法 选择2023年1月至2025年1月接收的50例急性白血病化疗患者为研究对象,将其按照随机数表分组方式分组,即对照组,采取基础护理,25例;观察组,采取感染风险评估分层的针对性护理,25例。对比两组护理效果。结果 (1)感染发生率,观察组更低于对照组 (P<0.05)。(2)心理状况,观察组护理后SAS、SDS评分更低于对照组(P<0.05)。(3)症状情况,观察组护理后贫血、出血、发热评分更低于对照组(P<0.05)。(4)生活状况,观察组护理后生理、心理、社会、环境方面评分更高于对照组(P<0.05)。(5)护理满意度,观察组更高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 此次创新护理干预在急性白血病化疗患者中效果较佳,可改善心理,缓解症状,预防感染,提高生活水平,达到患者护理满意标准,值得推广应用。

关键词: 感染风险评估分层;针对性护理;急性白血病;化疗

Abstract

Objective Explore the effects of this innovative nursing intervention on the selected research subjects in this article.
Methods 50 patients with acute leukemia who received chemotherapy from January 2023 to January 2025 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a control group using a random number table, with 25 patients receiving basic nursing care; The observation group received targeted nursing care based on infection risk assessment stratification, with 25 cases. Compare the nursing effects of two groups.
Results (1) The incidence of infection in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). (2) The psychological condition showed that the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group after nursing (P<0.05). (3) Symptoms showed that the observation group had lower scores for anemia, bleeding, and fever after nursing care compared to the control group (P<0.05). (4) Living conditions showed that the observation group had higher scores in physiological, psychological, social, and environmental aspects after nursing compared to the control group (P<0.05). (5) Nursing satisfaction was higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   This innovative nursing intervention has shown better results in patients with acute leukemia undergoing chemotherapy, improving their psychological well-being, relieving symptoms, preventing infections, improving their living standards, and meeting patient nursing satisfaction standards. It is worth promoting and applying.

Key words: Infection risk assessment stratification; Targeted nursing; Acute leukemia; Chemotherapy

参考文献 References

[1] 赵晶晶.针对性护理对急性白血病患者化疗后肛周感染的影响[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2021,38(5):542-543.

[2] 亓欣,陆爱文.急性白血病化疗患者并发医院感染的危险因素与护理对策[J].国际护理学杂志,2022,41(3): 408-412.

[3] 詹莎,王妍捷.全面护理干预对小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病初次化疗的影响[J].中文科技期刊数据库(引文版)医药卫生,2025(5):073-076.

[4] 符焕焕,刘梅,张亢.基于风险管理意识种植的护理模式干预对急性白血病化疗患者的影响[J].四川解剖学杂志,2025,33(1):193-195.

[5] 彭姝姝,卓玉瑜.基于感染风险评估分层的针对性护理在急性白血病化疗患者中的应用[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2025,32(4):40-43。

[6] 练远冰.基于感染风险评估的针对性护理在预防急性白血病化疗患者感染中的应用[J].中文科技期刊数据库(引文版)医药卫生,2024(9):0177-0180.

[7] 邢香芹,唐若莹,王二洁等.基于感染风险评估分层的针对性护理对急性白血病化疗病人感染预防及生活质量的影响[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2023,48(9):1282-1285.

[8] 胡娟.感染风险评估下分层干预对白血病化疗患者心理状况及感染发生率的影响[J].医疗装备,2024,37(10): 103-105.

[9] 黎丽娇. 基于功能状态护理方案对急性白血病化疗患者体能状态和并发症的影响[J].智慧健康,2025,11(11): 207-210.

[10] 夏霞,卢其玲,万孟超,等. 多角度多举措防控管理在初治急性白血病化疗期全身感染中的应用研究[J].中国当代医药,2024,31(27):159-162.

[11] 胥亚芝,问碧莹,张冬霞. 健康宣教在白血病化疗后血小板减少患者中的应用研究[J].江苏卫生事业管理,2024, 35(06): 812-815+828.