[email protected]

现代社会科学研究

Modern Social Science Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Modern Social Science Research. 2025; 5: (12) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20250472 .

On the judicial pathway of climate change governance
论气候变化治理的司法路径

作者: 闵星原 *

吉林大学 吉林长春

*通讯作者: 闵星原,单位:吉林大学 吉林长春;

引用本文: 闵星原 论气候变化治理的司法路径[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2025; 5: (12) : 83-85.
Published: 2025/12/10 15:22:50

摘要

气候变化是当今世界面临的最严峻挑战之一,其引发的极端天气事件、海平面上升、生态系统破坏等问题,对全球的经济、社会、环境和人类健康构成了巨大威胁。随着全球工业化进程的加速和人类活动对自然资源的高强度开发,温室气体排放持续增加,导致地球气候系统发生变化,气候变化已成为不容忽视的现实。目前我国气候变化的应对路径仍然处于探索阶段,聚焦于气候变化这一全球性挑战,深入探讨中国应对气候变化的路径,通过分析了国外气候变化的实践概况,映射出本国的气候变化诉讼基础权利空缺,气候变化应对类案件界定模糊,司法能动性发挥阻碍以及预防性司法不足等缺陷并提出相应的改善措施。

关键词: 气候变化诉讼;执法诉讼;双碳目标;司法能动性;风险预防

Abstract

Climate change is one of the most severe challenges facing the world today. Extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and ecosystem destruction caused by climate change pose significant threats to the global economy, society, environment, and human health. With the acceleration of global industrialization and the intensive exploitation of natural resources by human activities, greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, leading to changes in the Earth's climate system. Climate change has become an undeniable reality. Currently, China's approach to addressing climate change is still in the exploratory stage. Focusing on this global challenge, this paper delves into the judicial pathways for addressing climate change in China. By analyzing the practical experiences of foreign climate change litigation, it highlights the shortcomings in China's current system, including the lack of foundational rights for climate change litigation, ambiguous definitions of climate-related cases, obstacles to judicial activism, and insufficient preventive justice. Corresponding improvement measures are proposed to address these issues.

Key words: Climate change litigation; Enforcement litigation; Dual-carbon goals; Judicial activism; Risk prevention

参考文献 References

[1] 吴宇.论气候变化民事公益诉讼——兼评“环保组织URGENDA诉荷兰”案[J].私法研究,2018,23(2):199-223.

[2] 韩康宁,冷罗生.预防性司法视角下气候变化诉讼的中国范式——兼谈与环境公益诉讼的关系[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2023,25(05):119-130.

[3] 王社坤.论我国碳环评制度的构建[J].北方法学,2022, 16(02):27-36.

[4] 陈海嵩.国家环境保护义务的溯源与展开[J].法学研究,2014,36(03):62-81.

[5] 吴满昌,王立.生物多样性的司法保护路径研究——以预防性环境公益诉讼为视角[J].学术探索,2021,No.258(05): 105-116.

[6] 杜群,李子擎.域外气候变化诉讼的实证分析[J].荆楚法学,2023(3):84-94.

[7] 杜群,《巴黎协定》对气候变化诉讼发展的实证意义[J].政治与律,2022(7):48-64.

[8] 高利红.我国气候诉讼的法律路径:一个比较法的研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(1):167-176.

[9] 以习近平生态文明思想为指引努力建设人与自然和谐共生的现代化[J].环境与可持续发展,2023(2):68-72.

[10] 王小钢.环境法典风险预防原则条款研究[J].湖南师范大学社会科报,2020(6):34-40.

[11] 吴凯杰.论预防性检察环境公益诉讼的性质定位[J].中国地质大学学报学报(社会科学版),2021(1):30-44.