Modern Social Science Research
Modern Social Science Research. 2025; 5: (12) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20250466 .
总浏览量: 31
皖江工学院 安徽马鞍山
*通讯作者: 李恬,单位:皖江工学院 安徽马鞍山;
随着数据金融业务的发展和全球化进程的加快,不同文化背景下的数据金融应用日益受到关注。本研究选取具有代表性的中韩两国作为跨国比较分析的对象,旨在揭示中韩文化差异对数据金融应用的影响。研究采用跨文化理论作为分析框架,结合数据挖掘和文本分析技术,收集并分析两国金融机构的数据金融产品和服务案例。通过实证调查,该研究描绘了两国在个人信息保护、数据挖掘技术使用程度、金融产品创新与风险偏好等方面的异同,并结合每个国家的文化特性解释了这些差异。研究结果显示,韩国在个人信息保护方面实施更为严格的政策,而中国在数据挖掘技术的应用上具有更大的开放性和灵活性。此外,中国的数据金融产品更注重创新与多样化,韩国则在风险控制和产品稳定性上下更多工夫。总结了两国数据金融应用中的核心问题,包括数据安全、隐私保护、跨文化用户体验设计等。本研究不仅丰富了文化差异与数据金融应用结合的理论研究,而且提供了金融机构在面向不同文化背景用户时数据产品设计的策略建议。
As the development of data finance business and the acceleration of globalization progress, the applications of data finance under different cultural backgrounds are increasingly attracting attention. This study selects representative China and South Korea as the subjects for cross-national comparative analysis, aiming to reveal the impact of cultural differences between China and South Korea on the application of data finance. Using cross-cultural theory as an analytical framework, and combining data mining and text analysis techniques, the study collects and analyzes cases of data finance products and services from financial institutions in both countries. Through empirical surveys, the research depicts the similarities and differences between the two countries in aspects such as personal information protection, the extent of data mining technology usage, and the innovation and risk preferences of financial products, and it interprets these differences in light of each country's cultural characteristics. The results show that South Korea implements stricter policies on personal information protection, while China exhibits greater openness and flexibility in the application of data mining technologies. Moreover, China's data finance products are more focused on innovation and diversification, while South Korea puts more effort into risk control and product stability. The study summarizes core issues in the application of data finance in both countries, including data security, privacy protection, and cross-cultural user experience design. This research not only enriches the theoretical study of the combination of cultural differences and data finance application but also provides strategic recommendations for financial institutions on data product design for users from different cultural backgrounds.
[1] 何培育.基于互联网金融的大数据应用模式及价值研究[J].中国流通经济,2017:39-46.
[2] 国际资本流动对韩国金融稳定性影响研究[D].辽宁大学,2019.
[3] 金艳红.东亚文化圈下中韩大众文化比较分析[J].佳木斯职业学院学报,2016:69.
[4] 吴杰伟.韩国流行文化在东南亚的传播分析[J].东南亚研究,2015:88-94.
[5] Yoo, Kyeongwon.(Empirical Analysis on the Performance of Smile Microcreditt in Korea)[J].SSRN Electronic Journal,2016
[6] Explaining the Origins and Evolution of the Global Financial Inclusion Agenda[D].The University of Western Ontario (Canada),2021.
[7] 赵景;.大数据对金融统计的影响分析[J].时代金融,2019: 36-37.
[8] 许彦.Python在财务数据挖掘和分析中的应用[J].老字号品牌营销,2020:2.
[9] 王鹏懿;.基于大数据背景下金融统计的发展趋势[J].全国流通经济,2018:75-76.
[10] Alberto Cossu. Cultures of digital finance: the rise of the financial public sphere[J]. International Journal of Cultural Policy,2022
[11] Essays in International Banking[D]. Michigan State University, 2022.
[12] Yan Shen. Data governance in China’s platform economy [J]. China Economic Journal,2022
[13] 韩冬雪.中日韩数字服务贸易国际竞争力及其影响因素研究[J].,2023
[14] M Kudaibergenov. Intersectionality in Transnational English Teaching: Exploring the Dynamics of Privilege and Disadvantage in Korean ELT[D].,2024
[15] 崔家玮.东盟"10+3"合作对我国化工产品的贸易效应研究[J].,2023.