Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine
Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2025; 4: (11) ; 10.12208/j.jmnm.20250571 .
总浏览量: 59
宁夏医科大学总医院 宁夏银川
*通讯作者: 黄婷婷,单位:宁夏医科大学总医院 宁夏银川;
目的 分析临床护理路径对接受减重代谢手术患者的疗效并评估其对术后康复进程及患者生活质量的影响。方法 选取2024年6月-2025年5月142例减重代谢手术患者,通过随机分配将患者分为各71例患者的对照组和观察组。对照组实施常规护理,观察组则采用临床护理路径干预,通过对比两组在各指标上的差异来评估两种护理方式的具体效果。结果 相较于对照组观察组的手术时间和术后住院同时明显更短、术中出血量明显更少且并发症发生率明显更低(p<0.05),代谢改善情况:身体质量指数(BMI)、空腹血糖值(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)优于对照组(p<0.05),生活质量情况:身体机能、身体职能、躯体疼痛、总体健康显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。结论 临床护理路径可优化围手术期管理,促进代谢指标改善并全面提升患者生活质量,值得临床推广。
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of clinical nursing pathway on patients undergoing weight loss metabolic surgery and evaluate its impact on postoperative rehabilitation process and patient quality of life. Methods 142 patients who underwent weight loss metabolic surgery from June 2024 to May 2025 were selected and randomly assigned to a control group and an observation group of 71 patients each. The control group received routine nursing care, while the observation group received clinical nursing pathway intervention. The specific effects of the two nursing methods were evaluated by comparing the differences in various indicators between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly shorter surgery time and postoperative hospitalization, significantly less intraoperative bleeding, and a significantly lower incidence of complications (p<0.05). Metabolic improvement: Body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FPG), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were better than those of the control group (p<0.05). Quality of life: physical function, physical pain, and overall health were significantly higher than those of the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion The clinical nursing pathway can optimize perioperative management, promote metabolic index improvement, and comprehensively enhance patients' quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
[1] 中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和代谢病外科专家工作组,中国医药教育协会代谢病专业委员会,等.减重代谢手术治疗肥胖症合并多囊卵巢综合征中国专家共识(2025年版)[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2025,30(2):81-85.
[2] 廉东波,刘晨,闫巍,等.减重代谢手术效果综合评价系统(BAROS)的引进和初步应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020, 20(6):498-502+506.
[3] 孙霞, 李芹, 裴新荣,等. 基于加速康复外科理念的临床护理路径在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中的应用效果[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文),2022,8(8):17-20.
[4] 田惠,胡效坤,孟祥君,等.临床护理路径在功能区胶质瘤切除术患者中的效果评价[J].护理实践与研究,2025, 22(3): 436-442.
[5] 李娜. 临床护理路径在脑出血手术患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国社区医师, 2024, 40(36): 104-106.
[6] 王青玉,盛超,钟文耀,等.临床护理路径在T_(1)神经根切断缓解手屈指肌痉挛患者护理中的应用效果[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2025,34(3):410-413.
[7] 陈晓清.临床护理路径联合系统化护理干预对准分子激光手术患者屈光度及裸眼视力的影响观察[J].中文科技期刊数据库(引文版)医药卫生,2025(2):180-184.
[8] 郭晓睿,李蕾,张蓉,等.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸围麻醉期临床护理路径的构建[J].护理研究,2025,39(1):19-26.
[9] 张瑞花,周桂金.临床护理路径及术后延续护理干预在内镜治疗胆结石患者中的应用效果[J].中外医疗,2025, 44(4): 99-102.
[10] 高雨,陈登菊,杨巧,等.DRG支付制度下我国临床护理路径的研究现状及趋势[J].检验医学与临床,2024, 21(12): 1815-1818.