Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2025; 4: (10) ; 10.12208/j.jacn.20250521 .
总浏览量: 63
昆明医科大学第一附属医院 云南昆明
*通讯作者： 李春丽,单位：昆明医科大学第一附属医院 云南昆明；
目的 探讨临床护理在格林巴利综合征患者中的应用措施及安全性研究。方法 选取2024年1月-2025年1月内接收的格林巴利综合征患者100例，按随机数字表分对照组和观察组，各50例。其中对照组采取常规护理方法，观察组采用临床护理。对比两组的护理效果。结果 护理前，两组在神经功能（CSS）评分、日常生活能力（Barthel指数水平）评分方面，均未呈现出具有统计学意义的显著性差异（P＞0.05）。经护理后对比观察组与对照组数据发现，观察组CSS评分低于对照组；Barthel指数高于对照组（P＜0.05）；同时，观察组患者的住院时间短于对照组（P＜0.05），护理满意度高于对照组（P＜0.05），并发症发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 实施临床护理能有效改善格林巴利综合征患者的神经功能，提高其日常生活能力和护理满意度，降低并发症发生率，有较高应用价值。
Objective Exploring the application measures and safety research of clinical nursing in patients with Guillain Barr é syndrome. Methods 100 patients with Guillain Barr é syndrome received between January 2024 and May 2025 were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 50 patients in each group, according to a random number table. The control group received routine nursing care, while the observation group received clinical nursing care. Compare the nursing effects of the two groups. Results Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in the scores of neurological function (CSS) and daily living ability (Barthel index level) between the two groups. After nursing, comparing the data between the observation group and the control group, it was found that the CSS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group; The Barthel index was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05); At the same time, the hospitalization time of the observation group patients was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05), the nursing satisfaction was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Implementing clinical nursing can effectively improve the neurological function of patients with Guillain Barr é syndrome, enhance their daily living ability and nursing satisfaction, reduce the incidence of complications, and have high application value.
[1] 刘思雨. 格林巴利综合征患者应用早期康复护理干预效果观察[J]. 基层医学论坛（新加坡学术出版社）, 2024,6(5).
[2] 郭明迪.中西医结合护理对格林巴利综合征患者神经功能康复的影响[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2022,20(05): 158-160.
[3] 王巧巧.格林巴利综合征患者的中医治疗及中医护理[J].人人健康,2025,(17):76.
[4] 杨国华.早期康复护理在格林巴利综合征患者中的应用[J].中国城乡企业卫生,2019,34(11):164-166.
[5] 刘晓艺,黄雪娟,张秀霞,等.1例格林巴利综合征合并压力性损伤患者的护理体会[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2024, 31(08):93-95.
[6] 赵瑞娟.临床护理路径对老年格林巴利综合征患者康复及护理工作满意度的影响[J].山东医学高等专科学校学报,2019,41(02):155-156.
[7] 李芳.早期康复护理在格林巴利综合征患者中的应用效果研究[J].中国现代药物应用,2020,14(02):230-232.
[8] 单静,邱茜,李芙蓉,等.阶梯式康复护理联合人文关怀在格林巴利综合征机械通气患者中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(19):189-192.