Modern Social Science Research
Modern Social Science Research. 2025; 5: (11) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20250458 .
总浏览量: 18
中南林业科技大学法学院 湖南长沙
*通讯作者: 戴怀刑,单位:中南林业科技大学法学院 湖南长沙;
犯罪附随后果制度,是基于行为人犯罪前科或其犯罪记录,对行为人本人及特定关联主体(如家庭成员、亲属)的特定权利、资格或利益予以限制、禁止或剥夺的法律制度。研究综合采用规范分析、实证分析与比较研究揭示,该制度存在三重核心问题:一是附随后果与轻罪罪责不匹配;二是多数附随后果无期限限制,违背比例原则;三是对不同文化层次群体惩戒失衡问题。本文提出应确立“罪责自负”原则,通过规范性文件明确附随后果仅及于行为人、构建中国特色“轻罪前科附条件消灭”制度、实行差异化处罚,提升惩戒精准性与矫正效果。本文旨在解决醉酒型危险驾驶罪附随后果制度与轻罪治理理念脱节问题,推动制度完善以契合罪责刑相适应原则、助力犯罪人复归社会。
The system of collateral consequences of crimes refers to a legal system that restricts, prohibits, or deprives specific rights, qualifications, or interests of the actor themselves and specific related subjects (such as family members and relatives) based on the actor’s criminal record or prior conviction. Through a comprehensive approach combining normative analysis, empirical analysis, and comparative research, this study reveals three core problems of the system: first, the mismatch between collateral consequences and the liability of minor offenses; second, most collateral consequences have no time limit, violating the principle of proportionality; third, the unbalanced punishment among groups with different educational backgrounds. This paper proposes that the principle of "individual liability for one’s own crimes" should be established, collateral consequences should be clearly limited to the actor through normative documents, a China-specific "conditional elimination of minor offense records" system should be constructed, and differentiated punishment should be implemented to improve the accuracy of punishment and correction effects. This study aims to address the disconnection between the collateral consequences system for drunk driving-related dangerous driving offenses and the concept of minor offense governance, and promote the improvement of the system to conform to the principle of proportionality between crime, liability, and punishment, thereby facilitating the reintegration of offenders into society.
[1] 卢建平.为什么说我国已经进入轻罪时代[J].中国应用法学,2022,(03):132-142.
[2] 周光权. 论刑事一体化视角的危险驾驶罪[J]. 政治与法律, 2022, (01): 14-30.
[3] 全国机动车保有量达4.53亿辆驾驶人达5.42亿人[N]. 人民公安报, 2025-01-18 (001).
[4] 郭航.刑事一体化理念下轻罪治理模式的反思与重构[J].法商研究,2024,41(06):84-99.
[5] 最高人民检察院第一检察厅课题组.醉驾新规的诉讼法解读及其对完善我国轻罪案件诉讼程序的启示[J].中国应用法学,2024,(03):72-82.
[6] 郑英龙,何德辉.轻罪治理视角下的醉驾治理研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,54(11):87-103.
[7] 陈灿平,温新宇.醉酒型危险驾驶罪争议问题的法律与经济分析[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2023,60(02):138-144.
[8] CAPUDER K E.Can a Person’s “Slate” Ever Really Be “Cleaned”? The Modern⁃Day Implications of Pennsylvania’s Clean Slate Act,94 St[J].John’s Law Review, 2023(5):501-528.
[9] 耶赛克,魏根特. 德国刑法教科书:总论[M].徐久生,译.北京:中国法制出版社2001.
[10] 解志勇,雷雨薇.基于“醉驾刑”的“行政罚”之正当性反思与重构[J].比较法研究,2020,(06):54-75.
[11] 卢建平.轻罪时代的犯罪治理方略[J].政治与法律, 2022, (01):51-66.