[email protected]

现代社会科学研究

Modern Social Science Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Modern Social Science Research. 2026; 6: (1) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20260040 .

Innovation pathways in the regulatory system for green trusts
绿色信托监管制度创新路径

作者: 李雅哲 *

内蒙古大学法学院 内蒙古呼和浩特

*通讯作者: 李雅哲,单位:内蒙古大学法学院 内蒙古呼和浩特;

引用本文: 李雅哲 绿色信托监管制度创新路径[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2026; 6: (1) : 176-180.
Published: 2026/1/20 10:00:35

摘要

本文采用案例分析与规范研究方法,系统剖析了绿色信托监管在立法、执法及配套制度三个层面的核心困境。研究表明,立法层面高位阶统一法律的缺位、执法层面监管规则的模糊与陈旧、以及配套层面信息披露失真与多元共治机制的缺失,共同制约了绿色信托的健康发展。针对上述问题,本文提出应构建“法律-法规-规章-地方法规”多层次法律体系,细化具有可操作性的监管细则并引入大数据、区块链等智能化监管手段,同时完善ESG导向的信息披露与强制性第三方审查机制,以推动形成政府、市场与社会多元共治的“合作型”监管新格局。这些路径不仅为绿色信托监管提供了系统性的解决方案,也对完善我国绿色金融治理体系具有重要参考价值。

关键词: 绿色信托;监管制度;信息披露;ESG理论

Abstract

This paper employs case analysis and normative research methods to systematically examine the core challenges in the regulation of green trust across three dimensions: legislation, enforcement, and supporting mechanisms. The study reveals that the healthy development of green trust is constrained by the absence of high-level unified legislation, ambiguous and outdated regulatory rules in enforcement, as well as distorted information disclosure and the lack of a multi-stakeholder governance mechanism at the supporting level. To address these issues, the paper proposes the establishment of a multi-tiered legal framework comprising "laws—regulations—rules—local regulations," the refinement of operable regulatory guidelines, and the introduction of intelligent regulatory tools such as big data and blockchain. Additionally, it recommends enhancing ESG-oriented information disclosure and mandatory third-party review mechanisms to foster a new "cooperative" regulatory paradigm involving government, market, and society in multi-stakeholder governance. These pathways not only provide systematic solutions for green trust regulation but also offer significant reference value for improving China ' s green financial governance system.

Key words: Green trust; Regulatory system; Information disclosure; ESG theory

参考文献 References

[1] 曲晓燕,鲍星.绿色信托的实践与思考[J].中国金融, 2025,(13):72-73.

[2] 朱勇,袁田.强化绿色信托可持续信息披露[J].中国金融,2025,(06):74-75.

[3] 蔡火娣.绿色金融信托模式在我国的发展建议[J].上海金融,2017,(11):82-86.

[4] 孙秋枫,年综潜.“双碳”愿景下的绿色金融实践与体系建设[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,(01): 71-79.

[5] 王亚萍.“双碳”愿景下防范化解绿色金融“漂绿”风险的法制逻辑[J].兰州财经大学学报,2024,40(01):55-64.

[6] 张侠,潘新,吴晶晶.ESG表现对制造业高质量发展的影响——基于供应链视角[J].统计与决策,2025,41(17):155-160.

[7] 乃贵,吴桐.绿色金融法律保障机制研究[J].财经科学, 2017, (10):41-51.

[8] 潘晓滨,刘尚文.应对气候变化背景下我国转型金融法制化路径探析[J].气候变化研究进展,2024,20(04):465-474.

[9] 郭雳.制定金融法的时代需求与学理考量[J].财经法学, 2025,(02):19-39.

[10] 马格非,袁吉伟.提升绿色信托专业运营能力[J].中国金融,2024,(11):49-50.

[11] 周乾,朱云帆.我国绿色信托发展的制度瓶颈与破解路径[J].环境保护,2023,51(03):35-39.