Comparison of the detection results of microscopic examination of urine sediment and dry chemical method in routine urine tests
尿沉渣镜检与尿常规干化学法在尿常规检验中的检测结果对比

摘要

目的 针对尿常规检验开展时，运用尿沉渣镜检与尿常规干化学法情况下，获得的检验结果进行对比分析。方法 选取2023年1月到2023年12月期间，在我院进行尿常规检查的患者共80例，作为此次研究对象，检验过程中，分别运用尿沉渣镜检、尿常规干化学法，将两种不同检验方式视为实验组、对照组，观察两组获得的检测结果。结果 对比两组红白细胞检出情况，在实验组中，红白细胞的阳性检出率更高。数据之间差异明显，存在统计学意义（P<0.05）。对比两组粘液丝、化学结晶和管型检出情况，在实验组中阳性检出率更高。数据之间差异明显，存在统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 尿常规检验开展过程中，对比尿沉渣镜检与尿常规干化学法检测结果，结合尿沉渣镜方式时，具有较高的阳性检出率，应用价值比较高。

Abstract

Objective To conduct a comparative analysis of the test results obtained by microscopic examination of urine sediment and dry chemical method of urine routine during the implementation of urine routine tests.
Methods A total of 80 patients who underwent routine urine tests in our hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were selected as the research subjects. During the testing process, microscopic examination of urine sediment and dry chemical method of routine urine were respectively used. The two different testing methods were regarded as the experimental group and the control group, and the test results obtained by the two groups were observed.
Results By comparing the detection of red and white cells in the two groups, the positive detection rate of red and white cells was higher in the experimental group. The differences among the data were significant and statistically significant (P<0.05). The detection rates of mucus filaments, chemical crystals and casts were compared between the two groups. The positive detection rate was higher in the experimental group. The differences among the data were significant and statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion   During the implementation of routine urine tests, by comparing the results of microscopic examination of urine sediment with those of the dry chemical method of routine urine tests, and combining the microscopic method of urine sediment, a relatively high positive detection rate is achieved, and its application value is relatively high.