International Journal of Clinical Research
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2025; 9: (8) ; 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250403 .
总浏览量: 52
岑溪市妇幼保健院 广西岑溪
*通讯作者: 李璐娴,单位:岑溪市妇幼保健院 广西岑溪;
本研究宗旨在探讨BI-RADS分级标准在乳腺癌筛查中的应用效能,通过对比高级职称(副主任医师及以上)与非高级职称(主治医师及以下)医师的诊断一致性,评估规范化培训及质控体系对诊断质量的影响。目的 探讨乳腺高频超声联合 BI-RADS 分级在乳腺癌筛查中的应用效能,分析高级职称(副主任医师及以上)与非高级职称(主治医师及以下)医师的诊断一致性,评估规范化培训及质控体系的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2023-01至2024-06医院乳腺超声检查病例,共纳入疑似乳腺癌患者452例,分别由3名高级职称医师和5名非高级职称医师独立完成BI-RADS分级诊断。采用Kappa一致性检验与卡方检验进行数据分析,结果 显示两组医师诊断结果一致性无显著差异(Kappa=0.86 vs 0.82,P=0.12),(P>0.05)。结论 规范化培训与动态质控可缩小不同职称医师的诊断差异,BI-RADS 分级联合高频超声对乳腺癌筛查具有较高效能。
The purpose of this study is to explore the application efficiency of BI-RADS grading standard in breast cancer screening, and to evaluate the impact of standardized training and quality control system on diagnostic quality by comparing the diagnostic consistency of doctors with senior professional titles (associate chief physician and above) and non senior professional titles (attending physician and below). Objective To explore the application efficiency of breast high-frequency ultrasound combined with BI-RADS grading in breast cancer screening, analyze the diagnostic consistency of doctors with senior professional title (associate chief physician and above) and non senior professional title (attending physician and below), and evaluate the application value of standardized training and quality control system. Methods Retrospective analysis of breast ultrasound cases in hospitals from January 2023 to June 2024 included 452 patients with suspected breast cancer. BI-RADS grading diagnosis was independently completed by 3 doctors with senior professional titles and 5 doctors with non senior professional titles. Kappa consistency test and chi square test were used for data analysis, and the results showed that there was no significant difference in the consistency of diagnostic results between the two groups of physicians (Kappa=0.86 vs 0.82, P=0.12), (P>0.05). Conclusion Standardized training and dynamic quality control can reduce the diagnostic difference of doctors with different professional titles. BI-RADS grading combined with high-frequency ultrasound has a high efficacy in screening breast cancer.
[1] 黄峻琳,林青,崔春晓,苏晓慧,费洁,李丽丽,马锦竹,张敏.数字乳腺断层合成摄影对超声诊断为BI-RADS 4、5类≤30岁有症状女性乳腺良、恶性病变的诊断价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2021,29(8):794-800
[2] 任波,刘艳,单炜丽.超声乳腺影像报告和数据系统4C级乳腺癌临床病理特征及超声引导下穿刺活检对其的诊断价值分析[J].中国医学装备,2023,20(10):98-102
[3] 刘健,武敬平,王宁,李广涵,王秀红,王瑛,郑敏,张波.弹性应变率比值联合乳腺超声影像报告和数据系统诊断乳腺结节的应用价值[J].中国医学科学院学报,2021, 43(1):63-68
[4] 林鸣琴,庄淑莲,杨爽,曹君妍,张婷,肖嘉哲.乳腺影像学报告及数据系统分类对肉芽肿性乳腺炎与乳腺癌鉴别诊断的价值[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(3):75-79
[5] 沈倩倩,刘晓芳,任志翔,贺红霞,郝如意,陈武.剪切波弹性成像和超声造影联合评分鉴别不同大小BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块良恶性的临床价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2022, 24(7):521-526
[6] 刘琳,曹秀群,张博,张海青,孟磊,赵俊军,潘晓芳.乳腺结节三维剪切波超声成像冠状面参数优化BI-RADS分类的临床研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2022,33(3):176-178188
[7] 赵永存,高秀琴,李惠娟,张桂霞,程志荣,郭丽.高频超声应用乳腺超声影像报告和数据系统分类在乳腺癌筛查中的临床价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(22):5334-5337
[8] 闫雷,戚庭月,程莲,雷志锴,孙红光.声触诊组织成像定量参数联合年龄调整乳腺BI-RADS 4a类结节评级的价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2021,29(1):42-46
[9] 武林松,庄浩泽,曲琪,程玉芳,王坤,何年安.超声弹性成像联合乳腺影像报告和数据系统在鉴别小乳腺癌与乳腺增生中的应用价值[J].中国医学装备,2022,19(9):71-74
[10] 王慧珠,苑婉茹,栗河舟,张莹莹.三维能量多普勒超声联合VOCAL法对乳腺BI-RADS 4类肿块的诊断价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2022,30(10):996-1001.