Contemporary Nursing
Contemporary Nursing. 2025; 6: (8) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20250426 .
总浏览量: 17
重庆市沙坪坝区陈家桥医院 重庆
*通讯作者: 范青,单位:重庆市沙坪坝区陈家桥医院 重庆;
目的 将耳穴贴压不同选穴方案及护理用于颈椎病中,对其临床疗效进行探究。方法 选取2024年1月~2025年1月本院收治的80例颈椎病患者,随机数字表法分组,对照组40例行常规治疗及护理,观察组40例行耳穴贴压配合相关护理,对两组干预结果进行比较。结果 两组总有效率比较,观察组95.00%更高(P<0.05);干预前,两组视觉模拟法(VAS)评分、颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)无显著差异(P>0.05),干预后观察组各评分更低(P<0.05);干预前,两组生活质量评分无显著差异(P>0.05),干预后观察组生活质量评分更高(P<0.05);两组护理满意度比较,观察组97.50%更高(P<0.05)。结论 对颈椎病患者来说,实施耳穴贴压及相关护理可获得确切效果,还能减轻疼痛程度,改善颈椎功能,提高生活质量及护理满意度,值得应用。
Objective To apply different auricular point application schemes and nursing care in cervical spondylosis and explore their clinical efficacy. Methods A total of 80 patients with cervical spondylosis admitted to our hospital from April 1, 2021 to January 1, 2021 were selected and randomly divided into groups by the random number table method. 40 patients in the control group received conventional treatment and care, while 40 patients in the observation group received auricular point pressing combined with related care. The intervention results of the two groups were compared. Results Comparison of the total effective rate between the two groups showed that 95.00% in the observation group was higher (P<0.05); Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and cervical spine dysfunction Index (NDI) between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, the scores of each group in the observation group were lower (P<0.05). Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the quality of life scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, the quality of life score of the observation group was higher (P<0.05). The comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups showed that 97.50% was higher in the observation group (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with cervical spondylosis, the implementation of auricular point pressing and related nursing can achieve definite effects. It can also reduce the degree of pain, improve cervical spine function, enhance the quality of life and nursing satisfaction, and is worthy of application.
[1] 李雪松,张艺. 耳穴贴压联合中药穴位热敷治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2017, 17(5):609-611.
[2] 桂菡,石旭颖. 耳穴贴压配合"整颈三步九法"的推拿手法及穴位贴敷治疗颈椎病的临床观察[J]. 贵州医药, 2021, 45(8):1292-1293.
[3] 梁雪杏,林佳,宁晓军,等. 毫刃针结合耳穴贴压治疗颈型颈椎病临床观察[J]. 实用中医药杂志,2023,39(1):143-144.
[4] 林秋娥,赖燕清,吴环英. 刮痧联合耳穴贴压治疗神经根型颈椎病30例[J]. 蛇志,2021,33(3):319-320,353.
[5] 相道三. 小针刀联合耳穴贴压治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J]. 母婴世界,2021,15(13):60-61.
[6] 张金华,邱怡敏,张浩,等. 针刺配合耳穴贴压治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J]. 中医临床研究,2021,13(9):95-97.
[7] 蒋田,熊江艳,杨舒婷. 耳穴贴压治疗颈型颈椎病24例护理探讨[J]. 东方药膳,2021,17(10):167-168.
[8] 吕学红,魏雪红,段梅欣,等. 41例颈椎病失眠患者应用耳穴贴压联合呼吸补泻法的疗效观察[J]. 宁夏医学杂志,2024,46(9):820-822.
[9] 文钱,肖尊雄,张霞,等. 基于数据挖掘的耳穴治疗颈椎病的临床取穴规律[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2023,44(5):736-738.
[10] 袁冬,孟月婷,李倩,等. 耳部按摩联合耳穴贴压在颈型颈椎病护理中的应用[J]. 中医正骨,2023,35(4):78-80.