Analysis of the nursing intervention effect on pain management in patients with chronic osteomyelitis
慢性骨髓炎患者疼痛管理的护理干预效果分析

摘要

目的 探讨慢性骨髓炎患者护理干预过程中实施疼痛管理的效果。方法 选取2024年1月至2024年12月期间本院86例慢性骨髓炎患者，按随机数字表法分为对照组与研究组，各43例。对照组给予常规疼痛管理，研究组给予以疼痛管理为重点的护理干预，收集两组护理数据，比较不同过护理策略的效果。结果 相较于对照组，研究组换药次数更少，创伤愈合时间、住院时间更短（P＜0.05）；护理前，两组患者NRS评分对比并无明显差异（P＞0.05）；护理后1周、2周、4周NRS评分明显更低（P＜0.05）；比较两组护理前后情绪状态评分，护理前两组患者HAMA、HAMD评分对比无明显差异（P＞0.05），护理后，研究组两项评分均明显更低（P＜0.05）。结论 以疼痛管理为重点的护理干预可有效改善慢性骨髓炎患者疼痛程度，同时缓解负面情绪，对促进患者病情康复有积极意义。

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of pain management in the nursing intervention process of patients with chronic osteomyelitis.
Methods 86 patients with chronic osteomyelitis in our hospital from January 2024 to December 2024 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and a study group, with 43 patients in each group, using a random number table method. The control group received routine pain management, while the study group received nursing interventions with a focus on pain management. Two sets of nursing data were collected to compare the effects of different nursing strategies.
Results Compared with the control group, the study group had fewer dressing changes, shorter wound healing time, and shorter hospitalization time (P<0.05); Before nursing, there was no significant difference in NRS scores between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); The NRS scores were significantly lower at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after nursing (P<0.05); Comparing the emotional state scores of two groups before and after nursing, there was no significant difference in HAMA and HAMD scores between the two groups before nursing (P>0.05). After nursing, both scores in the study group were significantly lower (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Nursing interventions focused on pain management can effectively improve the pain level of patients with chronic osteomyelitis, while alleviating negative emotions, and have a positive impact on promoting patient recovery.