[email protected]

现代社会科学研究

Modern Social Science Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Modern Social Science Research. 2025; 5: (6) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20250222 .

Legal dilemma and outlet of social insurance payment system for flexible employment personnel——Regularization analysis based on proportional principle
灵活就业人员社保缴费制度的法律困境与出路——基于比例原则的规制分析

作者: 张露丹 *

西南医科大学人文与管理学院 四川泸州

*通讯作者: 张露丹,单位:西南医科大学人文与管理学院 四川泸州;

引用本文: 张露丹 灵活就业人员社保缴费制度的法律困境与出路——基于比例原则的规制分析[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2025; 5: (6) : 70-72.
Published: 2025/6/18 14:39:56

摘要

在互联网技术的迅猛发展、数字经济蓬勃兴起的时代浪潮下,产业结构不断调整升级,灵活就业作为一种新兴的就业模式迅速在劳动力市场中崛起并占据重要地位。与此同时,随着灵活就业人员劳动权益保障缺失、社保难缴纳等问题的涌现,灵活就业人员这个庞大群体的社会保障问题也成为社会关注的热点,本文通过文献分析以及案例分析可知在实践中关于社保如何缴纳存在着诸多不足,故以比例原则的视角下对劳动关系的认定、劳动者与企业就参保的利益冲突等方面的突出问题从不同角度兼顾各方利益来制度设计,以此更好的保障灵活就业群体长期稳定发展。

关键词: 灵活就业;社会保险缴费;比例原则;制度设计

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet technology and the booming wave of digital economy, industrial structure is constantly adjusted and upgraded, flexible employment as a new employment mode quickly rises in the labor market and occupies an important position. At the same time, with the emergence of flexible employment workers' lack of labor rights and interests protection and difficult payment of social security, the social security problems of flexible employment workers, a huge group, have also become a hot spot of social concern. Through literature analysis and case analysis, it can be seen that there are many shortcomings in practice on how to pay social security, so the prominent problems in the identification of labor relations from the perspective of the principle of proportion, and the conflicts of interest between laborers and enterprises on insurance participation are systematically designed from different perspectives by taking into account the interests of all parties, in order to better ensure the long-term stable development of flexible employment groups.

Key words: Flexible employment; Social insurance payment; Proportional principle; System design

参考文献 References

[1] 《国务院关于完善企业职工基本养老保险制度的决定》(国发[2005]38号)

[2] OECD. Pensions at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 Indicators[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing,2019:1-224.

[3] 刘权:《比例原则》,北京:清华大学出版社,2022年版,第20页.

[4] 黄君林.平台经济下反垄断的困境与法律规制研究[J].中国价格监管与反垄断,2025,(04):23-25.

[5] 杨超,王水明.劳动者个人信息保护:立场选择与实现路径[J].河北法学,2025,43(06):184-200.

[6] 王素芬,付浩然. 高质量发展视角下灵活就业人员参加职工医疗保险的三重维度[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报,2025,40(1):74-87. 

[7] 多伊普勒.德国劳动法[M].上海人民出版社,2015.

[8] 李楠.新型灵活就业者劳动权益保障法律问题研究[D].湖南工商大学,2021.

[9] 国际劳工组织.中国灵活就业人员和平台从业人员的社会保障研究[EB/OL].(2022-10-12). https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@asia/@ro-bangkok/@ilo-beijing/documents/publication/wcms_861984.pdf.

[10] 王峰.区块链技术在外卖平台订单跟踪中的应用探讨[J].软件,2024,45(12):116-118.

[11] 王小伟.平台算法从“黑箱”走向透明[N].证券时报,2025-04-29(A03).