Contemporary Nursing
Contemporary Nursing. 2025; 6: (5) ; 10.12208/j.cn.20250262 .
总浏览量: 123
宁夏回族自治区人民医院神经内科 宁夏银川
*通讯作者: 张苗,单位:宁夏回族自治区人民医院神经内科 宁夏银川;
目的 研究强化呼吸道护理联合综合护理在脑梗死并发肺部感染患者中的应用价值。方法 选择2024年1月-2025年1月我院80例脑梗死患者作为研究对象,通过计算机随机数字软件生成 1-80,双数者为对照组(n=40),行常规护理;单数者为观察组(n=40),行强化呼吸道护理联合综合护理。观察和对比两组肺部感染发生率、并发症发生率、治疗情况(ICU停留时间、机械通气时间、总住院时间)。结果 观察组肺部感染发生率为0.00%,低于对照组的12.00%,差异有统计学意义(χ²=5.143,P=0.023)。观察组并发症发生率为2.50%,低于对照组的17.50%,差异有统计学意义(χ²=5.000,P=0.025)。观察组ICU停留时间、机械通气时间、总住院时间同对照组比更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 强化呼吸道护理联合综合护理可进一步降低重症监护室脑梗死患者肺部感染及并发症发生率,可缩短ICU停留时间、机械通气时间、总住院时间。
Objective To study the application value of intensive respiratory care in patients with cerebral infarction and pulmonary infection. Methods 80 patients with cerebral infarction from January 2024 to January 2025 were selected as the research subjects, and 1-80 were generated by computer random number software, including the control group (n=40), the control group, the observation group (n=40), and the combined intensive respiratory nursing. Observe and compare the incidence of pulmonary infection, complications, and treatment (ICU stay time, mechanical ventilation time, total hospital stay) between the two groups. Results The incidence of pulmonary infection in the observation group was 0.00%, lower than 12.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=5.143, P=0.023). The complication rate in the observation group was 2.50%, which was lower than the 17.50% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=5.000, P=0.025). In the control group, ICU stay time, mechanical ventilation time and total hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than the control group, statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Intensive respiratory care combined with comprehensive care can further reduce the incidence of pulmonary infection and complications in patients with cerebral infarction in ICU, and shorten the ICU stay time, mechanical ventilation time and total hospital stay.
[1] 田晚霞.以目标管理理论为指导的护理干预对脑梗死长期卧床肺部感染患者生活质量及心理状态的影响[J].智慧健康,2024,10(30):130-132+136.
[2] 袁程程,刘艳.急性脑梗死患者肺部感染发生现状及影响因素分析[J].智慧健康,2024,10(08):77-79+88.
[3] 谢军.综合护理干预重症监护病房急性重症脑梗死并发肺部感染患者的临床效果分析[J].婚育与健康,2024, 30(04):154-156.
[4] 孟珂,张坤,来艳丽.早期康复护理干预对脑梗死患者生活质量及术后恢复的影响[J].慢性病学杂志,2024, 25(01): 75-77+81.
[5] 孙汉,张嫚.急性脑梗死诱发肺部感染的风险模型构建及对护理策略的指导价值[J].中西医结合护理(中英文), 2023,9(12):127-129.
[6] 李舒鑫.脑卒中气管切开患者预防肺部感染综合护理模式的构建及效果评价[D].河南科技大学,2023.
[7] 张世英,吕梅芬,吴远县,等.肺康复护理在急性脑梗死并发肺部感染患者治疗中的临床价值探究[J].智慧健康,2020,6(36):103-104.
[8] 孟清洁.护理干预对重症监护病房患者气管切开术后并发肺部感染的影响分析[J].当代临床医刊,2020, 33(04): 361-362.
[9] 李田田,王环环.重症监护室患者并发肺部感染的原因分析及个性化护理[J].心理月刊,2020,15(14):146.
[10] 佘玲.重症监护病房急性重症脑梗死并发肺部感染患者综合护理效果观察[J].基层医学论坛,2020,24(09):1206-1208.