[email protected]

现代社会科学研究

Modern Social Science Research

您当前位置:首页 > 精选文章

Modern Social Science Research. 2025; 5: (5) ; 10.12208/j.ssr.20250178 .

Study On the Identification of Car Rental Fraud Cases
骗租机动车后质押套现案件的定性探析

作者: 方妍 *

华南理工大学 广东广州

*通讯作者: 方妍,单位:华南理工大学 广东广州;

引用本文: 方妍 骗租机动车后质押套现案件的定性探析[J]. 现代社会科学研究, 2025; 5: (5) : 52-55.
Published: 2025/5/20 11:11:12

摘要

随着汽车租赁市场的快速发展,骗租机动车后质押套现的新型犯罪模式日益凸显,但该类案件的法律定性问题在理论与实践中存在较大分歧。本文聚焦前后行为的法律适用问题、后行为是否属于事后不可罚行为、本类案件的罪数形态问题等三个争议焦点,探析骗租机动车后质押套现案件的定性问题,旨在从百家争鸣的研究中探索出清晰的解释路径,为司法实践中对该类案件的定性提供帮助。

关键词: 诈骗罪;合同诈骗罪;事后不可罚行为;牵连犯

Abstract

With the rapid development of the car rental market, a new type of criminal model of renting a motor vehicle fraudulently and then pledging it for cash has become increasingly prominent. However, there are significant differences in the legal characterization of such cases in both theory and practice. This article focuses on three controversial issues: the legal application of the two acts, whether the subsequent act is a subsequent unpunishable act, and the form of multiple crimes in such cases. It explores the legal characterization of cases involving the fraudulent rental of motor vehicles followed by pledging them for cash, aiming to find a clear interpretative path from the diverse research and provide assistance for the legal characterization of such cases in judicial practice.

Key words: Fraud crime, Contract fraud crime, Subsequent unpunishable act, Implicated offence

参考文献 References

[1] 黄荣坚.基础刑法学(下)[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2004:430.

[2] 张丽卿.刑法总则理论与运用[M].台北:台湾神州图书出版有限公司,2003:409.

[3] 张明楷.刑法学(第六版)(上)[M].北京:法律出版社,2021:640.

[4] [日]西田典之.日本刑法总论(第二版)[M].王昭武,刘明祥译.北京:法律出版社, 2013:376.

[5] [德]耶塞克,魏根特.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001:897.

[6] 高铭暄,马克昌.刑法学(第十版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社、高等教育出版社,2022:190.

[7] 张明楷.刑法学(第六版)(上)[M].北京:法律出版社,2021:651.

[8] 张小虎.论牵连犯的典型界标[J].中国刑事法杂事,2013, (5):27-32.