Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine
Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2025; 4: (4) ; 10.12208/j.jmnm.20250183 .
总浏览量: 99
广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院 广东广州
*通讯作者: 林翔凤,单位:广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院 广东广州;
目的 针对性探讨肺癌免疫治疗患者皮肤护理期间采用思维导图健康教育的临床意义。方法 本次研究针对我科肺癌免疫治疗患者展开,并将2023年1月-2025年1月我科住院治疗及皮肤护理的100例作为研究对象,根据护理方法进行组别区分,将50例接受常规护理者纳入参照组,将50例接受思维导图健康教育者纳入研究组,观察两组护理效果,统计患者知识知晓评分、皮肤毒性反应发生率、生活质量评分、护理满意度,获取两组数据,利用统计学对比分析。结果 经统计,患者健康教育知识知晓评分比较,护理前两组评分无明显差异(P>0.05),护理后两组评分研究组高于参照组(P<0.05);患者皮肤毒性反应的发生率研究组低于参照组(P<0.05);患者生活质量评分比较研究组高于参照组(P<0.05);护理总满意率对比研究组高于参照组(P<0.05)。结论 肺癌免疫治疗患者皮肤护理期间采用思维导图健康教育可明显提高患者知识知晓水平,降低皮肤毒性反应发生,提高患者生活质量及护理满意度,效果获得医护患满意,建议临床中广泛使用。
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of mind mapping health education during skin care for patients with lung cancer immunotherapy. Methods This study was carried out on patients with lung cancer immunotherapy in our department, and 100 cases of inpatient treatment and skin care in our department from January 2023 to January 2025 were selected as research objects. The groups were divided according to the nursing methods, 50 cases receiving routine care were included in the reference group, and 50 cases receiving mind mapping health education were included in the research group. The nursing effect of the two groups was observed, and the knowledge knowledge score, the incidence of cutaneous toxic reactions, the quality of life score and the nursing satisfaction of the patients were statistically analyzed, and the data of the two groups were obtained. Results Statistically, there was no significant difference in the score of health education knowledge between the two groups before nursing (P > 0.05), and the score of the two groups after nursing was higher than that of the reference group (P < 0.05). The incidence of skin toxicity in the study group was lower than that in the reference group (P < 0.05). The quality of life score of the comparison group was higher than that of the reference group (P < 0.05). The total satisfaction rate of nursing in the comparison group was higher than that in the reference group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The use of mind mapping health education during skin care for patients with lung cancer immunotherapy can significantly improve the knowledge level of patients, reduce the occurrence of skin toxic reactions, improve the quality of life and nursing satisfaction of patients, and achieve the effect of medical and patient satisfaction. It is recommended to be widely used in clinical practice.
[1] 李粉红,唐磊磊,万娟,等. 思维导图健康教育用于肺癌免疫治疗患者皮肤护理中的效果观察[J]. 护理实践与研究,2024,21(3):380-386.
[2] 陆凌霞,张惠霞,李莉. 基于思维导图健康教育的微信延续护理在PICC置管患者中的应用[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文),2024,10(5):159-161.
[3] 沈丽红,温晓宇,胡文磊. 基于思维导图健康教育的微信延续护理对化疗间歇期PICC置管病人自我管理能力与导管维护质量的影响[J]. 循证护理,2023,9(5):923-926.
[4] 张婷,武彩霞,陈世杰. 思维导图健康教育模式结合基于动机保护理论的护理干预对肺心病患者病情控制及积极情绪的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(11):179-182.
[5] 赵玲玲,花雯,董晓宁,等. 以不良行为危害为关键词的思维导图式健康教育在青少年口腔正畸护理中的应用[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2023,42(20):3715-3719.
[6] 单静,吕苏梅,李海红,等. 思维导图联合回授法健康教育模式在骨与软组织肿瘤病人胸壁输液港护理中的应用[J]. 循证护理,2023,9(13):2381-2385.
[7] 卢溪. 思维导图与快速康复护理理念在结直肠癌患者阶段性健康教育中的应用[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2021, 37(2):433-435.
[8] 韩秀丽,韩晓慧. 思维导图健康教育模式在小儿肺炎患者中的护理效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(13): 2022-2024.
[9] 张爱民. 思维导图和快速康复护理理念在老年髋部骨折患者健康教育中的应用[J]. 河西学院学报,2021, 37(5): 34-38.
[10] 蔡红. 思维导图式健康教育结合聚焦解决护理在房颤患者中对治疗依从性及住院时间的价值[J]. 心血管病防治知识,2023,13(32):35-37.